Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-28-2005, 05:50 AM
MagnoliasFM MagnoliasFM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 89
Default Re: one annoying sit and go situation

Calling there IS his edge over the field.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-28-2005, 05:59 AM
apd138 apd138 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 43
Default Re: one annoying sit and go situation

I can't comment on the $215 tournies as I play mostly $11. As to the $11 I think folding here is bad this is because I think curtains will be ahead in this hand more times than he is facing a set. 67's or any suit for that matter is possible also ak's or ak'os I would be suprised but not shocked to see any random two here k10 910 etc. A lot of people at this limit are simply that bad and this particular player will be somewhat short stacked if he loses hand that often causes people to be desperate, or use the my dick is bigger than yours philosophy. Also I don't really think a $11 player (and with no knowledge any other player either) would move in with a set here.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-28-2005, 06:13 AM
TheAmp TheAmp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 171
Default Re: one annoying sit and go situation

To avoid any confusion, I refer to EV as risk neutral equity, such as in a ring game. EV should NOT be interpreted as tournament equity.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-28-2005, 08:10 AM
Ryan527h Ryan527h is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 71
Default Re: one annoying sit and go situation

Usually, for me atleast, pushing gets more calls than a pot sized bet on the flop, when the flush draw comes. Pushing is looked as more of a bluff. Betting the pot gives them improper odds.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-28-2005, 10:26 AM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: one annoying sit and go situation

[ QUOTE ]
To avoid any confusion, I refer to EV as risk neutral equity, such as in a ring game. EV should NOT be interpreted as tournament equity.

[/ QUOTE ]

Have you considered that thinking of CEV (Chip EV) in lieu of $EV (tournament equity) is the difference in your thought vs others?
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-28-2005, 11:10 AM
mackthefork mackthefork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: one annoying sit and go situation

Anyone who folds this hand is playing too high. End of.

Regards Mack
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.