Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-14-2002, 01:46 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default You guys might want to read . . . .



Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron," and then go back and read the article again carefully.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-14-2002, 03:04 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default absolutely wonderful! *NM*




Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-14-2002, 03:07 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: For all the Anti-Shaq clan out there...



i think the appeal here is to things beyond raw stats. of course the big guy is gonna be able to dunk it in everyone's face.


style points, Shaq is LAST on my list. i hate him. if i cared at all about the game, i would hate him with my very soul.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-14-2002, 11:38 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: For all the Anti-Shaq clan out there...



"Why should he shoot 3's"


The article doesn't say he should, the article said if he were 6'1" he'd have to, and he CANT, therefore he wouldn't make it in the NBA.


Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-15-2002, 06:39 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Great article



that 'oh if shaq were 6'1" he'd suck' argument is quite possibly THE most inane comment I've heard in quite some time. If Randy Johnson didn't throw so hard, he wouldn't be dominating. If Cris Carter didn't have great hands, he wouldn't catch a single pass. If Ichiro weren't so fast, he'd just be another utility outfielder.


What kind of ridiculous nonsense is that? Some people are blessed with incredible physical gifts, some are not. That's just the way things are. Shaq happens to be very big, always has been. As such, his game has always been that of a big man. He's never been asked to shoot 3's, why? Same reason Wilt, Kareem, and Hakeem have never done that. Shaq is NOT 6'1". He's 7'1". And he's huge. And yes, that's one of the reasons (if not the main reason) he's so dominant. But to keep 'if if if'ing about him is just meaningless.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-15-2002, 11:13 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Great article



Throwing fast, having great hands, and being fast are all, TALENTS + SKILLS. Being big is NOT a talent or skill.


Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-15-2002, 11:30 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Great article



Being able to move better than the other so called "big" men in the league when he is like 50 pounds heavier than them is talent..


Time for the other centres in the league to hit the weight room..
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-16-2002, 04:48 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Great article



I didn't say anything about talents or skills. I said 'physical gifts'. Can everyone throw 100+mph? Can everyone run to first base in 3.7 seconds? Is everyone 7'1"? I don't see any difference between all of them. Some people are just more physically blessed than others, and so it's pointless to say 'if if if' about that.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-20-2002, 06:47 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Traveling



I haven't watched much NBA ball lately. I'm from Denver. The Nuggets suck. 'nuff said.

However, the traveling rule hasn't been enforced for a long time. If you're shooting or passing, you're supposed to get a step and a jump, and release the ball before a foot comes down. It seems like you have to take 3 or 4 steps with the ball before there's a whistle.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.