#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I have limped in?
ok it was a huge misteke, It was not supposed to be CO+1 but UTG+1.
I'm sorry to have wasted your time with this mistake. I will be more careful next time. Still many thanks to those who took their time to read and respond. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I have limped in?
well, not the flop, but it would have been a straight flush at the turn.
It's not that I'm overly bothered with those things, but it got me thinking if the hand should have been played. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I have limped in?
I would have made a straight flush but thankfully nobody else had quads. The pain of missing the jackpot would have been unbearable. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I have limped in?
i wasnt trying to be an dick
utg + 1 and co + 1 are quite a bit different especially when deciding whether what to do with this hand -- id toss it utg+1 and on the button i might even raise i think that it is better to wait in this type of game -- youll end up doing well without playing this hand utg+1 cheers |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I have limped in?
It was not supposed to be CO+1 but UTG+1.
Then it's an easy fold. In the CO-1, I think it is still a fold, four limpers in front of you, it is a small mistake if it even is one. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I have limped in?
no, I never thought you were trying to be a dick. I know that I used the wrong position which made my post meaningless.
Thanks for the comments. That's what I thought, and I folded as well, but I just wanted to confirm that I wasn't loosing anything by not playing it. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I have limped in?
[ QUOTE ]
Party 10-handed, if someone raised from MP2+4 , SB+4 limps, BB-8 folds, CO-4 folds, button+2 calls, and I'm UTG+2-3 do I call or fold with A4s [/ QUOTE ] HAHAHAHAHAHA. I [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]LOVE[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] IT!! |
|
|