Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-09-2004, 10:12 AM
steveyz steveyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 142
Default Re: Good or Lucky? PT stat question

Yes, there is. Go to the "session notes" tab, and click on "More Detail..." in the upper right hand corner.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-09-2004, 10:44 AM
parachute parachute is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
Default Re: Good or Lucky? PT stat question

[ QUOTE ]
Hi maxx, if you're trying to decide who to listen, go with the guy with 4K+ posts, not the one with ~70.

[/ QUOTE ]

How many posts do you need to evaluate a 2+2 poster with confidence?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-09-2004, 01:13 PM
Louie Landale Louie Landale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,277
Default Re: Good or Lucky? PT stat question

I'm no stat guy. But I'd guess that if you are winning near your fair-share of hands then your BB/100 will be pretty close. With 10 people at the table your "fair share" would be winning 10 of 100 hands. But if you are playing tight you should be winning closer to 7 or 8 (you fold more eventual winners than the loose players, no duh). So if you are winning lets say 7.5 hands every 100 then your other stats are probably pretty close to accurate.

- Louie
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-09-2004, 01:51 PM
dogmeat dogmeat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Good or Lucky? PT stat question

I have to agree that 10K is not nearly enough. I have seen a lot of fluctuation in 5k and 10k samples. However, in my case, once I reached about 30K in pt I have seen only small changes in my overall hourly win. I have been playing mostly the same limit for almost 50K now, and my hourly rate has only varied by about a $1 up or down. Even with a cold-streak of about 10 days, once the next week went by my numbers were the same as before the streak.

I guess that is a long winded way of saying that for a player that is not necessarily improving, 30K hands should be a very good indication.

Dogmeat [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-09-2004, 05:07 PM
dogmeat dogmeat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: See thread of \"Some Simulations\"

See "Some Simulations" thread for some more numbers. I stand corrected to a minimum of 250,000 hands.

Dogmeat [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-09-2004, 08:12 PM
droidboy droidboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: oakland
Posts: 73
Default Re: Good or Lucky? PT stat question

[ QUOTE ]
After how many hands would you be confident to draw conclusions about your rate because of your play, and not due to the cards running over you in the shortterm?

[/ QUOTE ]

It depends on what you are doing with the hands. If you are just looking at the pure results, you'll need on the order of 100,000 hands. If you were doing curve fitting, you could probably get an estimate which was about as good with only 10,000-20,000 hands.

- Andrew

www.pokerstove.com
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-10-2004, 10:34 PM
Wahoo91 Wahoo91 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 492
Default Re: Good or Lucky? PT stat question

How many posts do you need to evaluate a 2+2 poster with confidence?

LOL [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Can someone run a model?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.