Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-06-2005, 08:11 PM
johnnybeef johnnybeef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: its whats for dinner
Posts: 878
Default Re: Quack Quack Quandry - 11\'s

[ QUOTE ]
What kind of hand ranges are you using?

I mean, ok, Q9o isn't a helluva lot better, but it's pretty signifigant. 22 is a top 20-25% hand, and Q9 is a 35% hand, unless I'm completely wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

you are

edit: according to hpfap 22 is a group 7 hand, q9s is group 5, q9 off is group 8
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-06-2005, 08:11 PM
gumpzilla gumpzilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,401
Default Re: Quack Quack Quandry - 11\'s

The advice so far is pretty spot on, in my opinion. There aren't a whole lot of situations where I'm going to be excited about calling with 22, and this isn't one of them. While UTG is pushing with a wide range, this doesn't really help you, as the only hands you do genuinely well against contain another 2. The rest of the time, you're either very close to 50-50 on one side of the other or a heavy dog. Although you are getting 5-3, you're probably better off just making some steals with the 5.5 BB you'll have left following this.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-06-2005, 08:15 PM
valenzuela valenzuela is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 453
Default Re: Quack Quack Quandry - 11\'s

6-11 odds clearly compensate the fact that u will see PPs, Im calling here, Im not folding a potential coinflip.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-06-2005, 08:21 PM
johnnybeef johnnybeef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: its whats for dinner
Posts: 878
Default This is a fold....end of discussion

anyone who says otherwise is a fish.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-06-2005, 08:31 PM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 766
Default Re: Quack Quack Quandry - 11\'s

Ok, let's run through some ranges of my choosing:
99-AA, AK-AQ = 5%
22 = 34%
Q9 = 25%

66-AA, AK-AT = 10%
22 = 36%
Q9 = 32%

44+, A7+, KJ+ = 15%
22 = 40%
Q9 = 34%

22+, A2+, K9+, QJ+ = 30%
22 = 44%
Q9 = 36%

22+, A2+, K2+, Q7+, JT = 40%
22 = 47%
Q9 = 42%
22+, A2+, K2+, Q2+, J7+, T9 = 50%
22 = 47%
Q9 = 45%

22+, A2+, K2+, Q2+, J2+, T5+, 96+, 86+, T2s+, 94s+, 84s+, 74s+, 64s+, 53s+, 43s+ = 70%
22 = 49%
Q9 = 49%

You can see that 22 is a lot better unless your opponent is pushing an insanely wide range. Still, I'm folding. I figure I'm 45%, and pot odds aren't that great. (I'm also folding Q9, of course, and probably A7, 88 is a really easy call).
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-06-2005, 08:50 PM
johnnybeef johnnybeef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: its whats for dinner
Posts: 878
Default Re: Quack Quack Quandry - 11\'s

Great analysis.....thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-06-2005, 08:55 PM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 766
Default Re: Quack Quack Quandry - 11\'s

Well, thanks for pushing me to do some actual work on this.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-06-2005, 11:37 PM
ClaytonN ClaytonN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,630
Default Re: This is a fold....end of discussion

K, well, I was planning on folding but SB called. QJ from original pusher, you guys were close.

It was one of those "in the moment" deals where I figured there is no way in hell I was calling. This was just to make sure my inclincations were somewhat correct.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.