#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: some observations about the split
I agree. I understand that the split is great for 10/20 and higher stakes players but for 5/10$ players it's terrible.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: some observations about the split
When this split was first discussed I played 5/10. Now I have played 100K 10/20 and have no plans to ever move down again. The same could be true for you experienced 5/10 players in a few months. Really the difference is more a bankroll issue than anything else, no matter what some say... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: some observations about the split
[ QUOTE ]
i think the split is awesome. no more sifting through .5/1 threads. no more weekly "need a preflop chart" threads. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with this. I love this forum. I will still reply once in a while to SSHUSH posts despite the fact I will probably hate that forum. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: some observations about the split
You could just post your 5/10 hands here replacing the "5/10" text with "10/20". [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: some observations about the split
[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: some observations about the split
[ QUOTE ]
You could just post your 5/10 hands here replacing the "5/10" text with "10/20". [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Back in the "glory days" of HUSH (yes, that is what I will call them hereforth), in one of the countless posts on the split, I suggested doing just that: but some killjoy pointed out that I might get inaccurate advice, more appropriate for 10/20 than 5/10. If I really wanted to pull this off, I'd have to start posting only well-played hands, so as to lend some plausibility to the claim that I'd actually have moved up; I'm not sure I can find enough well-played hands to make that claim stand up. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: some observations about the split
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i think the split is awesome. no more sifting through .5/1 threads. no more weekly "need a preflop chart" threads. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with this. I love this forum. I will still reply once in a while to SSHUSH posts because of the fact I will probably hate that forum. [/ QUOTE ] let's be honest |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: some observations about the split
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You could just post your 5/10 hands here replacing the "5/10" text with "10/20". [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Back in the "glory days" of HUSH (yes, that is what I will call them hereforth), in one of the countless posts on the split, I suggested doing just that: but some killjoy pointed out that I might get inaccurate advice, more appropriate for 10/20 than 5/10. If I really wanted to pull this off, I'd have to start posting only well-played hands, so as to lend some plausibility to the claim that I'd actually have moved up; I'm not sure I can find enough well-played hands to make that claim stand up. [/ QUOTE ] be careful that the difference in blind structure doesnt give you away a la this guy |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: some observations about the split
still, i think 5/10 and 10/20 are really different games. the difference is more pronounced in probably any other 2 limits with 1:2 limit ratio (i.e. betweeen 1/2 and 2/4, or 15/30 and 30/60). so while the 5/10 posters might be suffering a bit from the split, there's no question that 5/10 belongs in SHUSH, simply because it plays much more like 3/6 than it does 10/20.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: some observations about the split
Wow, Jba, that is verry funny. I'll try not to get caught.
|
|
|