#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL ring game buy in accumulation question. (Low content)
My guess is that somehow you accidently got into a play money game, I can't imagine any other way for that to happen. Either you accidently chose it or Party had a glitch and sent you to play money when you chose real money.
I'm probably wrong but that is my reasonable, logical, educated guess. One street at a time wdbaker Denver, Co |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL ring game buy in accumulation question. (Low content)
I woulden't be surprised if this were a glitch. At turning stone casino, they have a 100 max 1-2NL game that I play frequently, and it often spreads to 3 tables, with two being must-move to the main table. It's not uncommon to see a couple people with 300-500 at the main table, and the chip leader can build to 600+ with solid play and some luck, since the main table gets fed new blood from the other tables all night. When somone busts, instead of buying in for 100, often a new player will come in with several hundred that they brought from one of the other tables. So my point is that this is a game where building a huge stack is very possible, because there are generally many, many buy-ins on the table.
I know the guy who holds the record cashout at that game, a little over $1,600, but that's still only 16 buy ins, and to get it he had to clean out a player with $600 in one hand. Granted, this game is a lot tougher than a 25 buy in party game, but you get my point. Fourty buy-ins is just absurd, it seems as though something is wrong. But hey, it's partypoker, and weird things happen there every day. Ya never know. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL ring game buy in accumulation question. (Low content)
Why couldn't he have just been there for an obscene amount of time. What if 4 guys just rotated and kept playing the table for days... is that unreasonable?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL ring game buy in accumulation question. (Low content)
[ QUOTE ]
Why couldn't he have just been there for an obscene amount of time. What if 4 guys just rotated and kept playing the table for days... is that unreasonable? [/ QUOTE ] That is quite possible as well. Heck, it could be just him, the same Turning Stone player I mentioned before sat at the same game for 50 straight hours last time i was there. Same seat for two days straight. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL ring game buy in accumulation question. (Low content)
About a month ago I was watching a room at Party NL100 and one guy had $2800. Unfortunately, I didn't get to see him play because he was being delt out before he left. Another player said that the guy had been up even more earlier.
|
|
|