Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-08-2005, 04:30 PM
diebitter diebitter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 417
Default Re: back to the subject of TITS

[ QUOTE ]

really? I thought it was just because dogs love to lick their bollocks- so anything good must be like the dogs bollocks..

[/ QUOTE ]
F see me after class
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-08-2005, 07:23 PM
gorie gorie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: it\'s like a puzzle with pans. if you think about it.
Posts: 892
Default Re: back to the subject of TITS

[ QUOTE ]
No, it's to do with whether it's definite or not.

If something is "tits", it's also bad. If it's "the tits", it's good.

[/ QUOTE ]

i don't really get it, i mean i do, but i don't. why would anyone use the word tits to describe something that is bad ? don't you like tits ? for sh*t , it makes perfect sense.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-08-2005, 07:31 PM
Phoenix1010 Phoenix1010 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Where the beer flows like wine
Posts: 282
Default Re: back to the subject of TITS

[ QUOTE ]
"

"singular = bad
plural = good"

No, it's to do with whether it's definite or not.

If something is "tits", it's also bad. If it's "the tits", it's good. Same with bollocks. "Bollocks" is bad, "the (dog's) bollocks" is good. Same with sh*t.

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Things that are "tits" are good. Things that are "the tits" are especially good. Something that is "a tit" is bad, because really, who wants just one tit?

Watching Sin City is tits. Watching Sin City while you're high is the tits. Michael Madsen acts like a tit in that movie.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-08-2005, 07:32 PM
TheMainEvent TheMainEvent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 544
Default Re: back to the subject of TITS

[ QUOTE ]
No. Things that are "tits" are good. Things that are "the tits" are especially good. Something that is "a tit" is bad, because really, who wants just one tit?

[/ QUOTE ]

DING DING DING
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-08-2005, 07:38 PM
nicky g nicky g is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London, UK - but I\'m Irish!
Posts: 1,905
Default Re: back to the subject of TITS

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"

"singular = bad
plural = good"

No, it's to do with whether it's definite or not.

If something is "tits", it's also bad. If it's "the tits", it's good. Same with bollocks. "Bollocks" is bad, "the (dog's) bollocks" is good. Same with sh*t.

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Things that are "tits" are good. Things that are "the tits" are especially good. Something that is "a tit" is bad, because really, who wants just one tit?



[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe in whatver tits town you're in, that's the case.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-08-2005, 08:53 PM
TheCroShow TheCroShow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Victoria, BC Canada
Posts: 114
Default Re: back to the subject of TITS

haven't you guys heard something like "you're a useless tit!"
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-08-2005, 11:06 PM
TBag TBag is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: back to the subject of TITS

Bad:





Good:

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.