Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 11-15-2005, 09:51 PM
radek2166 radek2166 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 859
Default Re: A hand Entity and I talked about

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm sorry but I don't see what not capping the flop has to do with the decision on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who said it had anything to do with the river? I still feel the flop should be played out this way as I nearly c/r a blank on the turn w/AA, KK.

[/ QUOTE ]

The person I replied to said

[ QUOTE ]
I think by not capping the flop we have put ourselves in postion to either Check behind on the river or Bet call.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

It was me for the fact capping the flop help to better define SB's hand.

I think the hand plays differently with a capped flop.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 11-15-2005, 09:56 PM
Joe Tall Joe Tall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 4,238
Default Re: A hand Entity and I talked about

Sorry, Jason...

So, did you bet the river? Or did you misplay every street??!? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 11-15-2005, 10:03 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A hand Entity and I talked about

simple...you bet...you get two ways to win that way...he checkraises you call, the pot is too big to pass on now because of one big bet.

at flop, wonder why you did not slowplay, hoping to keep others in the hand and get their money too...you seem pretty strong there, board does not look very useful at that point to SB who raised preflop...
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 11-15-2005, 10:04 PM
private joker private joker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,943
Default Re: A hand Entity and I talked about

[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, Jason...

So, did you bet the river? Or did you misplay every street??!? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Joe, in what way did Jason misplay the turn? I read all your other posts in this thread and you never brought it up.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 11-15-2005, 10:23 PM
thejameser thejameser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I\'m a FAG:Frugal Aggressive(Not that there is anything wrong with that)
Posts: 410
Default Re: A hand Entity and I talked about

i think the quality of the opponent would be a significant factor in my decision. i am betting the river. if its 2/4 i bet/call; too easy for a 2/4 player, even with "TAG" stats to overplay two pair on that river. if it is the 30 game on party i could bet/fold against a TAG.

edit from would to could bet/fold
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 11-15-2005, 10:32 PM
TStoneMBD TStoneMBD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 268
Default Re: A hand Entity and I talked about

the flop smoothcall is correct imo and there is no need to "define" the opponents hand when we are holding the nuts. you define a players hand to find out if you are behind so you can fold cheaply or to find out how to extract maximum value. the opponents hand is already pretty clearly defined.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 11-15-2005, 10:44 PM
radek2166 radek2166 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 859
Default Re: A hand Entity and I talked about

[ QUOTE ]
the flop smoothcall is correct imo and there is no need to "define" the opponents hand when we are holding the nuts. you define a players hand to find out if you are behind so you can fold cheaply or to find out how to extract maximum value. the opponents hand is already pretty clearly defined.

[/ QUOTE ]

So explain this to me like I am a 5 year old.whats the sb holding?

To me if he has an over pair he is along for the ride.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 11-15-2005, 11:35 PM
Joe Tall Joe Tall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 4,238
Default Re: A hand Entity and I talked about

[ QUOTE ]
the flop smoothcall is correct imo and there is no need to "define" the opponents hand when we are holding the nuts. you define a players hand to find out if you are behind so you can fold cheaply... the opponents hand is already pretty clearly defined.


[/ QUOTE ]

What are you talking about, "define a players hand"? You call the flop and he three bets the turn, what did you "define"?

[ QUOTE ]
find out how to extract maximum value.

[/ QUOTE ]

Capping the flop and leading the turn as the TAG will c/r a blank often w/AA, KK, is the line I that has the most value in addition to the other things I've stated in my original post.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 11-15-2005, 11:48 PM
ErrantNight ErrantNight is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1
Default Re: A hand Entity and I talked about

I don't care about the results but I'm curious as to how the discussion between you and Entity went. Unless it just rehashes everything discussed already, here. Which I think has been thoroughly exhausted.
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 11-16-2005, 12:01 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: A hand Entity and I talked about

[ QUOTE ]
the flop smoothcall is correct imo and there is no need to "define" the opponents hand when we are holding the nuts. you define a players hand to find out if you are behind so you can fold cheaply or to find out how to extract maximum value. the opponents hand is already pretty clearly defined.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think because his hand is so defined, a flop cap is better than a call-raise line. How's that? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

rob
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.