Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 10-03-2004, 09:14 PM
juanez juanez is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Land of Oz
Posts: 41
Default Re: overused 2+2 cliches

I'm starting to get sick of: "Read SSH"
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 10-04-2004, 01:35 AM
Schneids Schneids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 1,084
Default Re: overused 2+2 cliches

[ QUOTE ]
I'm the same player, how do I run so good in one 17,000 hand stretch and run so bad in another 13,000 hand stretch?

Duh, because 15/30 is soooooooooooooooooooooo much harder than 10/20 shorthanded. You must be underbankrolled. Rookie.
<font color="white"> SARCASM! </font>

-AA

[/ QUOTE ]

ummm... Zing??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Don't make me steal your pride just like how I stole that 15/30 fish Bicyclekick's pride in a HU match.
<font color="white"> SARCASM! </font>
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 10-04-2004, 03:29 AM
ThinkQuick ThinkQuick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 97
Default Re: overused 2+2 clichés

[ QUOTE ]
It just seems counter intuitive that 10k , 20k or 50k hands are not enough to determine &lt;insert poker question here&gt; when very, very, small sample sizes are used to determine very important issues, including ones that are even more complicated than poker (e.g. medical and drug tests on human beings).

[/ QUOTE ]

Unfortunately this is crazytalk.
Even if we assumed that the same definition of the word 'sample' properly applied to both statistics and biological matter, then the 'sample size' of a blood test would indeed be enormous.
Tests quantify the amount or concentration of tiny molecules in a quantitity of blood that is gigantic in comparison.

For example, after fasting, in one deciliter (10th of a Liter, 100 ml) of normal blood, ~70-110mg of glucose would be found.

That's at least 2.34 x 10^20 glucose molecules.
that's 2 340 000 000 000 000 000 000 molecules.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 10-04-2004, 09:12 AM
ArchAngel71857 ArchAngel71857 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Penthouse Suite, Bellagio
Posts: 578
Default Re: overused 2+2 cliches

I have text in white font.


-AA
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 10-04-2004, 02:10 PM
Wahoo91 Wahoo91 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 492
Default Re: overused 2+2 clichés

I was thinking more along the lines of human clinical trials of new drugs where human participants are the "sample", not blood itself.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 10-04-2004, 02:28 PM
Schneids Schneids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 1,084
Default Re: overused 2+2 cliches

[ QUOTE ]
I have text in white font.


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 10-04-2004, 04:22 PM
junkmail3 junkmail3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 249
Default Re: overused 2+2 cliches

[ QUOTE ]
how do I run so good in one 17,000 hand stretch and run so bad in another 13,000 hand stretch?

[/ QUOTE ]

You need to focus on winning more at the showdown at 15/30. You only won slightly over 50% at 15/20 compared to over 55% at 10/20. This should be your focal point of your game. Do you see why?
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 10-04-2004, 06:05 PM
ArchAngel71857 ArchAngel71857 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Penthouse Suite, Bellagio
Posts: 578
Default Re: overused 2+2 cliches

I can't even tell if you replied to me, or if you think using white text is overused. I am so easily confused.

-AA
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 10-04-2004, 06:38 PM
ThinkQuick ThinkQuick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 97
Default Re: overused 2+2 clichés

Indeed then, thank you for clarifying, I thought you were crazy.

still disagree though. hundreds of millions of dollars on enough patients to determine the minimum effective doses and relevant toxicities
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.