#101
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overused 2+2 cliches
I'm starting to get sick of: "Read SSH"
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overused 2+2 cliches
[ QUOTE ]
I'm the same player, how do I run so good in one 17,000 hand stretch and run so bad in another 13,000 hand stretch? Duh, because 15/30 is soooooooooooooooooooooo much harder than 10/20 shorthanded. You must be underbankrolled. Rookie. <font color="white"> SARCASM! </font> -AA [/ QUOTE ] ummm... Zing??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] Don't make me steal your pride just like how I stole that 15/30 fish Bicyclekick's pride in a HU match. <font color="white"> SARCASM! </font> |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overused 2+2 clichés
[ QUOTE ]
It just seems counter intuitive that 10k , 20k or 50k hands are not enough to determine <insert poker question here> when very, very, small sample sizes are used to determine very important issues, including ones that are even more complicated than poker (e.g. medical and drug tests on human beings). [/ QUOTE ] Unfortunately this is crazytalk. Even if we assumed that the same definition of the word 'sample' properly applied to both statistics and biological matter, then the 'sample size' of a blood test would indeed be enormous. Tests quantify the amount or concentration of tiny molecules in a quantitity of blood that is gigantic in comparison. For example, after fasting, in one deciliter (10th of a Liter, 100 ml) of normal blood, ~70-110mg of glucose would be found. That's at least 2.34 x 10^20 glucose molecules. that's 2 340 000 000 000 000 000 000 molecules. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overused 2+2 cliches
I have text in white font.
-AA |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overused 2+2 clichés
I was thinking more along the lines of human clinical trials of new drugs where human participants are the "sample", not blood itself.
|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overused 2+2 cliches
[ QUOTE ]
I have text in white font. [/ QUOTE ] |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overused 2+2 cliches
[ QUOTE ]
how do I run so good in one 17,000 hand stretch and run so bad in another 13,000 hand stretch? [/ QUOTE ] You need to focus on winning more at the showdown at 15/30. You only won slightly over 50% at 15/20 compared to over 55% at 10/20. This should be your focal point of your game. Do you see why? |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overused 2+2 cliches
I can't even tell if you replied to me, or if you think using white text is overused. I am so easily confused.
-AA |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overused 2+2 clichés
Indeed then, thank you for clarifying, I thought you were crazy.
still disagree though. hundreds of millions of dollars on enough patients to determine the minimum effective doses and relevant toxicities |
|
|