What is your perfect 6 MAX table ?

[Mig]

Hi,
I'm wondering what kind of table everyone feels confortable to play with.
Where do you want the light raiser at ?
Where do you want the calling station?
Do you like to play in a table with 5 calling stations ?
If there is a shark at the table where do you want it ?
Basically what is your perfect table ?
Do you always want to have position on the maniac ?
etc etc [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Thanks for the feed back

[Chiron]

Hmm, I'd be interested in what the more experienced posters think as well.

I typically avoid tables with more than 1 shark, and I'll take calling stations and weak tight b!tches over maniacs any day. I leave a table if I can't control the action myself. This seems to work very well for me 1-2 tabling.

[Mig]

I personnaly really don't like to have more than 1-2 calling stations at my table. The problem is this one. Whenever you have a lot of calling stations at your table, they are 5 to draw on you, your TPTK won't hold often. I prefer a light raiser to my right with a few weak tight around the table and a passive calling station to my left I think. I don't like being raised [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[imported_CaseClosed326]

Me and 5 loose passive calling stations.

[kidcolin]

ditto.

[Grisgra]

[ QUOTE ]
Me and 5 loose passive calling stations.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd rather go with 3 loose-passive calling stations to my right, and a couple weak-tight wusses to my left. Pretty much how Mason describes the ideal table (half loose-passive, half weak-tight).

If you promise to give me good cards I'll throw a maniac in there [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

[imported_CaseClosed326]

[ QUOTE ]
[
If you promise to give me good cards I'll throw a maniac in there [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

[/ QUOTE ]

Were all out of that, but how about a maniac on a supreme rush?

[Mr. Graff]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[
If you promise to give me good cards I'll throw a maniac in there [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

[/ QUOTE ]

Were all out of that, but how about a maniac on a supreme rush?

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess that would be the supreme time to test how far you have come mentally as a poker player. I still have less hair after a session like that than I did before the session started [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[aslowjoe]

[ QUOTE ]


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Me and 5 loose passive calling stations.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I'd rather go with 3 loose-passive calling stations to my right, and a couple weak-tight wusses to my left. Pretty much how Mason describes the ideal table (half loose-passive, half weak-tight).

If you promise to give me good cards I'll throw a maniac in there .

[/ QUOTE ]

Im there

[MrWookie47]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Me and 5 loose passive calling stations.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd rather go with 3 loose-passive calling stations to my right, and a couple weak-tight wusses to my left. Pretty much how Mason describes the ideal table (half loose-passive, half weak-tight).

If you promise to give me good cards I'll throw a maniac in there [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

[/ QUOTE ]

That's my perfect table, too. I've been playing at 1/2 6 max, so calling stations are a dime a dozen, but the weak-tighties are harder to find. I'm always leaping at every opportunity to sit with a weak-tightie behind me, because I know that the calling stations and maniacs are sure to come fill out the table.