Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-10-2005, 08:17 AM
Toro Toro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 367
Default Scott Boras = Amazing

Read in this mornings paper that Derek Lowe has a tentative agreement with the Dodgers for $36 Million @ 4 years. No one was even competing for this guy's services. How the hell does he get $36 million? Amazing!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-10-2005, 09:27 AM
Hack Hack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,536
Default Re: Scott Boras = Amazing

He's not worth even 10 million over 4 years. The guy SUCKS as a pitcher. The Dodgers are the only team that want him I hear.

Sure, he pitched okay for one game in the ALCS. He still SUCKS. He got lucky, just like a fish. Even terrible pitchers have great outings sometimes, and that's what Derek Lowe is. A terrible pitcher. Why do you think Boston ditched him?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-10-2005, 09:55 AM
Toro Toro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 367
Default Re: Scott Boras = Amazing

[ QUOTE ]
He's not worth even 10 million over 4 years. The guy SUCKS as a pitcher. The Dodgers are the only team that want him I hear.

Sure, he pitched okay for one game in the ALCS. He still SUCKS. He got lucky, just like a fish. Even terrible pitchers have great outings sometimes, and that's what Derek Lowe is. A terrible pitcher. Why do you think Boston ditched him?

[/ QUOTE ]

You're preaching to the choir but I don't think he totally sucks as you do. He's a #3 or 4 starter, certainly not worth $9 million per year.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-10-2005, 10:16 AM
Hack Hack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,536
Default Re: Scott Boras = Amazing

He was better as a closer. That's what he used to be

That's the job he should be hired for. He normally does fine in the first couple of innings but once the lineup has seen him they figure his pattern out and he is [censored].

He's just not meant to be a starter.

But Wakefield sucks even more than Lowe. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-10-2005, 03:42 PM
nothumb nothumb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 90
Default Re: Scott Boras = Amazing

[ QUOTE ]
He normally does fine in the first couple of innings but once the lineup has seen him they figure his pattern out and he is [censored].


[/ QUOTE ]

During the WS they were talking about how Lowe had been influenced positively by spending more time with Schilling, who spends like a zillion hours analyzing how well his opponents can hit a splitter thrown low and away on a Tuesday when the wind chill factor is 10 degrees less than the actual temperature.

Lowe just never put in that kind of work... but apparently his playoff performance was the result of some more careful study and focus. (BTW, he won THREE big games in the playoffs - the clincher in every series).

I agree with whoever said Lowe will benefit from the Dodger defense. Foul territory shouldn't be a huge factor as he is a groundball pitcher.

I liked D-Lo, but I won't be too sad to see him go. He made my blood pressure rise. I like the Sox rotation this year.

NT
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-10-2005, 03:46 PM
Hack Hack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,536
Default Re: Scott Boras = Amazing

I like it too.

Especially David Wells. Should have insisted on a weight clause with him. He is a good pitcher(when healthy), but he has attitude problems and is somewhat of a rebel. He should fit in good with the idiots.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-10-2005, 12:48 PM
andyfox andyfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,677
Default Re: Scott Boras = Amazing

2002: 21-8 2.58
2003: 17-7 4.47
2004: 14-12 5.52

Not exactly an encouraging trend. He sure looked good in the post-season though. Pitchers seem to have an easier time going from the AL to the NL. I look for him to win 13-15 games with an ERA in the low 4's.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-10-2005, 02:41 PM
nolanfan34 nolanfan34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Oly, WA
Posts: 70
Default Re: Scott Boras = Amazing

I concur. I just about fell out of my chair when I saw he signed for that. He got more than Odalis Perez. And Matt Clement. Absolutely crazy.

Paul DePodesta must see something that the rest of us don't.

I do think Lowe will have a good season there, with a good defense behind him, and pitching in Dodger Stadium (although I wonder how the decrease in foul territory will change things). Lowe will be a nice later round fantasy sleeper to take a flier on.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-10-2005, 02:44 PM
Hack Hack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,536
Default Re: Scott Boras = Amazing

Dodgers have a history of overpaying for players, just like the Mets do.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-10-2005, 03:19 PM
bugstud bugstud is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 418
Default Re: Scott Boras = Amazing

I think his groundball tendencies will be helped a lot by the dodgers defense as opposed to boston's, plus the additionbal bonuses of being in chavez ravine.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.