Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2005, 01:56 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Just for the hell of it

I know none of you care at all because you live in the states and frankly if I lived in the states i wouldn't care at all but on monday the Paul martin's liberal government in Canada is going to fall and there is going to be an election. Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-27-2005, 02:01 AM
jokerthief jokerthief is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Just for the hell of it

This confirms my suspision that Canada should now be treated as military threat to us. I think America ought to seriously consider a pre-emptive move against this threat. The Canadian meanace can not be tolerated.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2005, 04:13 AM
fluxrad fluxrad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Peruvian highlands.
Posts: 1,169
Default Re: Just for the hell of it

[ QUOTE ]
This confirms my suspision that Canada should now be treated as military threat to us. I think America ought to seriously consider a pre-emptive move against this threat. The Canadian meanace can not be tolerated.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hear they have WMD's.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2005, 10:39 PM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 27
Default Re: Just for the hell of it

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This confirms my suspision that Canada should now be treated as military threat to us. I think America ought to seriously consider a pre-emptive move against this threat. The Canadian meanace can not be tolerated.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hear they have WMD's.

[/ QUOTE ]

Also, some of the 9/11 attackers had some rather vague, unsubstantiated ties to the Canadian government (despite the fact that al Qaeda's goals are diametrically different from secular Canada's; and that in fact, Canada and al Qeada are philosophical, if not outright political opponents) - for instance, 9/11 ring-leader Mohamed Atta met with a Canadian intelligence officer in Prague in the Spring of 2001, which Vice President Cheney said proved that Canada had "long-established ties" with al Qaeda.

Consequently, 57% of Americans now believe Canada was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-27-2005, 11:12 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Just for the hell of it

[ QUOTE ]
...Vice President Cheney said proved that Canada had "long-established ties" with al Qaeda.

Consequently, 57% of Americans now believe Canada was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks.

[/ QUOTE ]
When you toss fire bombs like this, it would be of great help to those of us who(m) like to occasionally verify things, to use your linky-doo. Should you happen to have one - or two. And they're handy. Sure don't want to inconvenience you. thx
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-27-2005, 11:20 PM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 27
Default Re: Just for the hell of it

[ QUOTE ]
When you toss fire bombs like this, it would be of great help to those of us who(m) like to occasionally verify things, to use your linky-doo. Should you happen to have one - or two. And they're handy. Sure don't want to inconvenience you. thx

[/ QUOTE ]

Believe me, this was no inconvenience...

------------------------------------

"Well-timed silence hath more eloquence than speech."
- Martin Fraquhar Tupper
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-27-2005, 03:05 AM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 375
Default Re: Just for the hell of it

You have the British monarch's picture on your money and stamps, and mushy-headed French liberalism in your politics. No wonder Canada is unstable.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-28-2005, 01:14 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Just for the hell of it

Personally I hope the liberals do not get a minority because their corrupt and stealing tax payers money and since I would never in my life vote NDP(Socialist) I am hoping the conservatives win. Unfortunately Canada is full of lots of extremely left wing people who hate America and think anything that isn't left wing is fascist. The National is a pretty good news program and is fairly accurate so what you hear on that is probably right.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-28-2005, 01:44 AM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 27
Default Re: Just for the hell of it

[ QUOTE ]
Unfortunately Canada is full of lots of extremely left wing people who hate America

[/ QUOTE ]

I once heard from a Canadian acquaintance (a pastor from British Columbia - who I don't believe is a leftist) that one of the worst things you can call a Canadian is an American.

However, it must be noted that my acquaintance had also told me he refused to visit Vancouver often (when he lived in BC) because "of all the crime there" – telling me all of this after he had just recently moved to the Detroit area. Needless to say, I think he reconsidered after spending some time living in the Detroit area, and conceded that perhaps Vancouver wasn’t nearly so crime-ridden after all. So perhaps we can call into question his wisdom.

[ QUOTE ]
At this point it'll then be a question as to whether the Conservatives can work with the Bloc in order to stay in power.

[/ QUOTE ]

On a note more related to the thread, one thing I'm still fuzzy on (and perhaps someone will be able to shed some light on this for me) - how would the Conservatives and the Bloc manage to form a stable alliance, given their philosophical and ideological differences (and from what I know, a blanket unwillingness on behalf of the Bloc to participate in any federal government)? Are the Conservatives substantially more sympathetic to Quebec sovereignty than the Liberals? Do the Conservatives have a specific Quebec policy (that the Bloc might somehow find tolerable) - and more generally, do the Conservatives favor 'weaker' federalism/federalist policies than the other Federal Parties do?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-28-2005, 11:12 AM
HopeydaFish HopeydaFish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 151
Default Re: Just for the hell of it

[ QUOTE ]

I once heard from a Canadian acquaintance (a pastor from British Columbia - who I don't believe is a leftist) that one of the worst things you can call a Canadian is an American.

[/ QUOTE ]

This might be true when Canadians are travelling. Americans are not looked upon favourably in many parts of the world. Most Canadians wouldn't want to be mistaken for an American for that reason -- whatever their personal feelings towards Americans may be.

[ QUOTE ]

On a note more related to the thread, one thing I'm still fuzzy on (and perhaps someone will be able to shed some light on this for me) - how would the Conservatives and the Bloc manage to form a stable alliance, given their philosophical and ideological differences (and from what I know, a blanket unwillingness on behalf of the Bloc to participate in any federal government)? Are the Conservatives substantially more sympathetic to Quebec sovereignty than the Liberals? Do the Conservatives have a specific Quebec policy (that the Bloc might somehow find tolerable) - and more generally, do the Conservatives favor 'weaker' federalism/federalist policies than the other Federal Parties do?

[/ QUOTE ]

You've basically deduced the answer to your question on your own. Much of the Conservatives' platform is similar to the Bloc's. Both parties believe in a more decentralized government which gives more power to the provinces. The Liberals have traditionally been a party which believes in a strong federal government -- which runs contrary to the Bloc's beliefs. The Bloc should be willing to work with the Conservatives if it means more power for Quebec because, short of separation, this is the only way that the Bloc will achieve its goals.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.