#1
|
|||
|
|||
enough about showing hands
What about talking? I have a habit of talking about hands at the table. Verbalizing what I think other players have when bad players make calls against players that I know aren't bluffing. As an example of talking too much: Just yesterday I asked to see the cards of a couple of players that were head up and raising each other. The guy next to me said "what can you possibly get from seeing their cards". I said do you really want to know. He said yes. So I told him that it gives me ideas about starting hand criteria, whether they'll raise on the draw, whether they'll re-raise with second pair if they have position, etc etc. He still smirked and thought I was foolish. But the question is: How come I didn't just say something like - well I'm not in the hand anymore and this is the only way I can do anything to be in the hand. And then act clueless and just smile? And also, how bad is discussing play while playing? Thanks, -Michael |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: enough about showing hands
While you might not be violating any official rules, you are certainly treading over several ethical standards. The rules of thumb are: > Don't ask to see someone's cards after a showdown unless you suspect collusion. > Definitely don't talk about the play if you're not in the hand. > Better to not talk about the play of a hand in which you're involved if there are 2 or more opponents. > If it's headsup, you might verbally speculate to try to pick up a tell, but some feel that even that is unethical. Observation is good if you don't know your opponents, but talking about the play while in progress is usually a big no-no. But I have a feeling you already knew that. |
|
|