Lets create a list of Party Fish!!!

[Redhotman]

As John brought up in his post below, many good players have flocked to party. This has made it very difficult to play when you dont have a read on anyone. The good players have indirectly made the bad players tougher to beat.
What I propose is a collaboration between the 2+2's of Party Fish.

Just want to get this idea out there, see what the rest of you rocks think.

[GuyOnTilt]

Bad idea. I'd like to think I have at least some class. I really hope that others on this forum will have the tact and decency to not respond positively to this idea.

[Joe Tall]

[ QUOTE ]
The good players have indirectly made the bad players tougher to beat.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just by this statement alone; I'm fairly confindent I can give you one:

Party List:

1. Redhotman

Now, don't get upset, my point is that it may be bad play that is costing you money now not good players.

You should post some hands for analysis and let the forum decide. We can help you work on your game.

Welcome to the forum,
Joe Tall

[Redhotman]

Did you read John Shafts thread below??
When you sit at a table and have no reads at a player on party it is hard to tell right away if they are playing correctly(as the player did against John) or just another maniac.

PS: I have put alot of hand histories on here smart ass.

[Redhotman]

I really dont see what the big deal is, I ahve a list of losers in my poker tracker database, as do you.
What is so indecent about sharing the list?

[Joe Tall]

[ QUOTE ]
Did you read John Shafts thread below??

[/ QUOTE ]

I haven't yet but I will.

[ QUOTE ]
When you sit at a table and have no reads at a player on party it is hard to tell right away if they are playing correctly

[/ QUOTE ]

Anyone has the right to play the way they want. You'll have to develop skills that will give those reads.

[ QUOTE ]
I have put alot of hand histories

[/ QUOTE ]

I look them up and read them.

[ QUOTE ]
on here smart XXX.

[/ QUOTE ]

Look, I didn't mean to get you upset, but seemingly I struck a nerve. I am sorry, I just tried to make a strong point and I guess it worked.

Again, welcome,
Joe Tall

[BigEndian]

Sorry Red, I'm not big on the idea. Not to mention that, at some level, we're all fish to some other player. And players are not machines, they learn. So a fish one week could a different player the next.

I don't head-hunt myself yet. Haven't needed to. I just pull up a chair at the first available table and play my game adapted to the table at hand.

- Groove

[ThingDo]

who cares? this is pointless. A couple of hands and you'll know who you are up against... when you move up higher limits ( not saying you aren't moving up now ) your list will grow... but this post is stupid and stuff like this has been flooding the forum as of late... sorry.

[GuyOnTilt]

Having a list of players that I think are "fish" on my harddrive is one thing. Posting a collective list on a public forum is another. It's just plain classless. More advanced posters in this forum may think YOU are a fish. How would you feel if your name was posted on this list?

[Redhotman]

Dont apoligize for disagreeing, you bring up some good points.