#1
|
|||
|
|||
Since Party is the WORST, who\'s the BEST for MTTs?
Since there's a thread on Party being the worst MTT site, I'm curious of opinions in the opposite direction.
Which site(s) do you all think has the BEST MTT structure? I like slow levels that climb in small increments. And I do prefer Antes. Stars seems be pretty solid. But they seem to be the only site that only puts 9 ppl on a table. UB has a solid structure as well, as the binds aren't monsters later in the tourney. Paradise climbs too quickly and the final 2 tables are a crapshoot. They also don't start players with enough chips in their bigger tournies like the 100K, and it also needs longer levels. (But I do well there for some reason) What about sites like Bodog, Full Tilt, Absolute, etc? Any of these have great MTT formats that I haven't heard about? -Scott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Since Party is the WORST, who\'s the BEST for MTTs?
Partypoker - low chips, blind structure is ok, no ante
Pokerroom - 1500 chips, decent blind structure, no ante, usually a low number of entries, 200-400 for most tourneys, 20k guaranteed usually has about 700. Pokerstars - 1500 chips, good blind structure, antes, huge # of entrants per tourney. great site. Ultimatebet - 2000 chips, good blind structure. smaller amount of entries ala pokerroom. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Since Party is the WORST, who\'s the BEST for MTTs?
Empire is just like party, except that the levels are 20 minutes instead of 15, which makes quite a difference. Also, the tourneys are smaller - which might be a good thing if you like that, and most importantly the guaranteed tourneys (of which there are several daily), almost always have overlays.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Since Party is the WORST, who\'s the BEST for MTTs?
Full tilt, deep stack, slow blinds with antes, ideal mtt site for solid players
Pokerroom doesn't have a good blind structure either, in fact, it is one of the fastest ~Justin Edit: <-----Wow, officially a Pooh-Bah now, sweeeet! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Since Party is the WORST, who\'s the BEST for MTTs?
I actually prefer Party's MTT structure over Stars.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Since Party is the WORST, who\'s the BEST for MTTs?
FT, Party, and Stars are the best.
PR has a horrible one, but they also in my opinion have the worst MTT players. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Since Party is the WORST, who\'s the BEST for MTTs?
[ QUOTE ]
Full tilt, deep stack, slow blinds with antes, ideal mtt site for solid players Pokerroom doesn't have a good blind structure either, in fact, it is one of the fastest ~Justin Edit: <-----Wow, officially a Pooh-Bah now, sweeeet! [/ QUOTE ] Can anyone post the FT MTT structure here? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Since Party is the WORST, who\'s the BEST for MTTs?
I just opend up an account there and I'm planing to play the $109 today.
The structure is the following: starting chips 2000, 10 min lvls. 15/30 20/40 25/50 30/60 40/80 and so on, antes from lvl 10 on. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Since Party is the WORST, who\'s the BEST for MTTs?
10min levels? That seems pretty fast, Stars has 15min and sometimes I feel that it's still not enough. But the slow escalation of the blinds themselves seems like a good idea.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Since Party is the WORST, who\'s the BEST for MTTs?
Full tilt is more for the aggressive player, the blinds/antes are nice to steal.
|
|
|