More Overrated - Vick or Roethlisberger

[pudley4]

The game isn't officially over yet, but since they're both blowouts let's get this poll going...

[Homer]

Vick, easy.

[daryn]

agreed, just going by the definition of overrated.

[istewart]

Obviously Vick, but Vick is obviously more valuable as well. I mean, how often do you hear the Michael Vick experience? And then you look at his passing stats...

[Mano]

I don't think anybody was rating Rothlisberger as a "great" QB just yet, just were all amazed that he seemed to be able to avoid making typical rookie mistakes, and wouldn't lose the game for you, which is what he needed to do with the team he was on this season. Unfortunately, that has all changed in the playoffs, and we are seeing why rookie QB's don't usually fare well in the NFL. Hope this performance doesn't do him permanent damage, as I think he has shown potential to be a decent QB.

[ClaytonN]

Vick, only because Roethlessberger wasn't nearly as hyper.

[Nottom]

I vote for Roethlisberger.

Basically I think Pittsburg got to the Championship game dispite the fact that Big Ben was their quarterback. It is hard to argue that the Falcons could be there without Vick.

Vick gets a lot of hype, but no one really considers him a great quarterback. People always just talk about how exciting he is to watch.

Then again, I'm from Va Tech so I could be a bit biased.

[Daliman]

Roethlisberger gets a bit of a pass here because he had the bad thumb, and his expectations are not as high. Vick is supposedly the Messiah, and I have have been saying all along that if a team can contain him at all, he is a subpar QB, period. Ben is a solid QB with many good years ahead of him.

[jakethebake]

I don't think anyone is overrating Ben R. now.

[Clarkmeister]

Manning. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]