Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2002, 12:45 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 1 on 1



It seems to me that most of the troubles that on-line poker can face come from the money laundering aspects of heads-up play. I would not be surprised if they discontinue 1 on 1 completely, and keep the ring games, as that may help the avoid the BS coming from our f'ed-up government (rings game cheating is different from money laundering troubles / investigations). I would suspect that 1 on 1 is going to go away soon for just the type of situations that are listed below. I can't see that they make that much money from heads-up anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-26-2002, 06:11 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1 on 1



They make a hell of alot more money one one one. The game is about 5 times as fast. I mainly play one on one #-6 at paradise and drop at least 30 - 50 dollars an hour there to the rake.


I am a winning player at paradise and would vbe very disappointed if they dropped the game.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-26-2002, 09:16 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1 on 1



While they main gain more rake per hour in relation to the amount of players playing in 1on1, I am sure that they lose alot more players indefinately to players like Playboy. A weak player can easily lose his entire buyin in one night playing headsup, however, this player may have lasted for weeks at a ring game, contributing much more to the rake. Nevertheless, this whole matter seems rather amusing, and I am curious as to what comes of it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.