Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-23-2004, 01:42 PM
Jimbobobb Jimbobobb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stats mean nothing. How you play means everything.
Posts: 379
Default Top Pair Mid Kicker - gimme your line and why?

Hooray for my first hand, and absolutely no notes on a single person at the table, which is odd.

Party Poker 0.50/1 Hold'em (9 handed)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG folds, UTG+1 calls, MP1 folds, MP2 calls, MP3 folds, CO folds, Button folds, SB completes, Hero checks.

Flop: (4 SB) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="CC3333">MP2 raises</font>, SB calls, Hero calls, UTG+1 calls.

Turn: (6 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(4 players)</font>
SB checks,

and hero......
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-23-2004, 02:00 PM
MagicRat MagicRat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 11
Default Re: Top Pair Mid Kicker - gimme your line and why?

I think you have to bet out. MP2 may just be playing his flush draw aggressively, not necessarily a Q with better kicker. You'll be in a better place once you see what he does. The SB cold-calling but then checking the turn could be troublesome but I still think you've got to go for it!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-23-2004, 02:10 PM
flair1239 flair1239 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 343
Default Re: Top Pair Mid Kicker - gimme your line and why?

Well you are dealing with a wide range of hands.

Possibilities include:
QT, QJ, KJ, AT, KT or a flush draw.

You would like to think that with AA, KK, AQ, KQ, QQ, or TT, he would raise PF (Being that you have no reads, I don't think that this is a bad line of thought.)

I may be going overboard on this, but I almost veiw the flop as a raise or fold situation. But I guess I can't say just calling his raise was a "bad" play.

I would bet into him on the turn. The reasoning being, that if he is on any sort of a draw the turn has missed him completely. If it comes back raised, I guess I have to give it up at that point.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-23-2004, 02:20 PM
Jimbobobb Jimbobobb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stats mean nothing. How you play means everything.
Posts: 379
Default Re: Top Pair Mid Kicker - gimme your line and why?

Hero definitely bets. That flop is just too ripe with draws for me to give a draw a free card. I didn't 3-bet the flop because I'd rather have a clearer idea of where I stand on the turn if it bricks. Lots of hands that beat me might be put into check/call mode if I 3-bet the flop. So I bet the turn - who folds to a raise?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-23-2004, 05:16 PM
flair1239 flair1239 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 343
Default Re: Top Pair Mid Kicker - gimme your line and why?

[ QUOTE ]
So I bet the turn - who folds to a raise?

[/ QUOTE ]

I do.

After more time to think about it, I really think the flop should of been reraise or fold. I think simply calling the raise showed we were not overly happy with our hand.

I still think you have to bet the turn, but I think by simply calling the raise on the flop, it could induce a semi-bluff raise on the turn. Where by reraising the flop and then leading out, it makes him make a decision.

I don't think that folding the flop would hae been out of line.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-23-2004, 05:45 PM
Nottom Nottom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hokie Country
Posts: 4,030
Default Re: Top Pair Mid Kicker - gimme your line and why?

[ QUOTE ]
After more time to think about it, I really think the flop should of been reraise or fold. I think simply calling the raise showed we were not overly happy with our hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm starting to like the stop-n-go more and more on very draw heavy boards like this. Even if I'm pretty sure I'm ahead (say I had KQ here) with all those people in the pot, most of the money going in is going to the draw anyway so I'd rather not help him build a pot, plus if he did out flop me I save a bet or two as he is less likely to raise the turn without a big hand while a flop raise doesn't really give me much information.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-23-2004, 06:12 PM
afk afk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 150
Default Re: Top Pair Mid Kicker - gimme your line and why?

Hey Nottom,

I like that line of thinking, my question is if you bet the turn can you safely fold to a raise in a hand like this? I think that could be a no-brainer.

edit: I didn't really read a lot of the thread and missed the fact that this has been addressed a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-23-2004, 07:31 PM
Nottom Nottom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hokie Country
Posts: 4,030
Default Re: Top Pair Mid Kicker - gimme your line and why?

Its somewhat opponent dependant, in this case I think you probably can against a normal opponent. With a better kicker you might have to call down.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-24-2004, 10:28 AM
flair1239 flair1239 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 343
Default Re: Top Pair Mid Kicker - gimme your line and why?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
After more time to think about it, I really think the flop should of been reraise or fold. I think simply calling the raise showed we were not overly happy with our hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm starting to like the stop-n-go more and more on very draw heavy boards like this. Even if I'm pretty sure I'm ahead (say I had KQ here) with all those people in the pot, most of the money going in is going to the draw anyway so I'd rather not help him build a pot, plus if he did out flop me I save a bet or two as he is less likely to raise the turn without a big hand while a flop raise doesn't really give me much information.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't completely disagree. However, I think it sends conflicting signals, and not necessarily strong ones. To me it is a sign of indecision, where the player likes his hand, but realises it is very beatable.

Like I said, I think against a certain type of player, you are inviting a turn raise that really you have no choice but to fold to (with the hand in question... and yes no choice is an exaggeration). Whereas by playing back at him on the flop, then leading into him, it put the pressure on him. Another benefit in my mind is if you do get raised on the turn after such aggression, you have no qualms about folding, because it is almost certain that you are beat, but you still are'nt married to the pot.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-24-2004, 10:49 AM
Jimbobobb Jimbobobb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stats mean nothing. How you play means everything.
Posts: 379
Default Re: Top Pair Mid Kicker - gimme your line and why?

Basically my thoughts were kind of along both lines. 3-betting the flop gets me nowhere, as there are lots of draws he might cap with, and I still don't know where I am. I'd fold to a raise on the turn, but I can't see a draw doing that, and since I'm pretty sure I'm gonna see a showdown (whether it includes me in it or not) with this hand, if they're tricky enough to raise a draw here, I'll have that information for later. As it ended up, half the field folded on the brick turn, and the river bricked again, and the rest folded to my bet.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.