#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stars Turbo NL SNGs
Anyone else think it is an awful, awful idea to get involved with these?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Turbo NL SNGs
Those of us that play at Party would probably not think it's that awful an idea since we've already been playing "Turbo SNGSs". [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Turbo NL SNGs
I've been making damn good money on them personally.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Turbo NL SNGs
[ QUOTE ]
I've been making damn good money on them personally. [/ QUOTE ] Me too, but my sample is rather small. However, I believe that I will continue to make money on the turbo games for the following reasons: 1. Most players in these games are very loose even at the first two levels. When I catch a monster, it's very easy to get someone allin and double up. 2. Most players don't understand the gap concept so they are easy to outplay during the "allin-or-fold" stage which comes very early in the turbo games. Early indications are that I will have more 8th and 9th place finishes in the turbo games, but my in-the-money percentages appear to be similar to the slower sngs. When I realized that (it looks like) I will be making basically the same return in half the time on these games, I decided to play them exclusively (after I bust out of whatever multi I played that night [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]). So, no, I don't think playing the turbos is awful. Far from it. Later, Che |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Turbo NL SNGs
Nope, I just finished another one. I'm on a limited sample size, but so far they're plenty soft, profitable, and possible to finish in a reasonable amount of time. Add to that the reduced rake, and I see my favorite new single table tournament.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Turbo NL SNGs
I haven't played enough yet but my success rate in slower (less turbo) games is much much higher so far. I think that's because these games have been my sole diet since I started poker (and play almost exclusively at stars).
That said, a good player I suppose gets good because they can adapt to a game soon after they sit down and read the play. For that reason alone I reckon they can't be bad as they offer a different style to adapt to. Just my opinion (with mixed results to date!) stoneii |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Turbo NL SNGs
Are these turbo SnG's high speed as well; akin to the high speed 6 max ring games on Stars?
Or are they only turbo in the fact that the blinds escalate much quicker? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Turbo NL SNGs
My sample size is very small (21 tourneys), but I have to say that I like what I see. More 'gamblers' in them (esp the $15 games), combined with a lower rake make them a pretty good proposition.
Sure, I'll win less money on each game and suffer a higher variance, but they last about half the time, so the hourly rate figures to be higher - quite a bit higher, in fact. Of course, if your playing style and temperament are not suited to this type of game then you should avoid them, sure. But I play tourneys at Paradise Poker too, and these Stars’ Turbo games *still* have more play to them than that (highly profitable) crapshoot. At the very least it's nice to have the option to play different tourney structures. PSS |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Turbo NL SNGs
The timer is only 30 seconds instead of 60, but otherwise they're the same other than the blind levels.
|
|
|