Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-01-2004, 11:16 AM
Pitcher Pitcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 135
Default 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s

Hi All,

I posted awhile back about moving up. I wanted to make the move from $50 to $200. I wasn't sure if this was such a great idea, but I had been occassionaly trying these and my results indicated I was not completely outclassed. Because I had such good long term results at the $50 level, I was sure I would be fine. So, here are the 1st. weeks results. This is admittedly not a large enough sample to be statistically valid. Ironically, though, these numbers are very similar to what I was doing at the $50 level. Also, I generally play "1 1/2 games at a time" What that means is that I will be in two games alot. I will start a second game anytime I am not down to heads up in the 1st game because I have a hard time during that period of a tournament concentrating on a second game. Anyway, here are my stats from Poker Tracker

# of tournaments: 44
Net amount won: $4140
Finished in the $: 45.45%
Avg Finish: 4.47
1st. place: 8
2nd place: 4
3rd place: 8

Over 2590 hands here are some further stats to mull over:

Saw Flop All Hands: 16.22%
Saw Flop Not a Blind: 9.85

Hands that I try to Steal on!
Attempt to Steal Blinds (fingers aren't chopped completely off [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]) :42.23%
Steal Success: 50% no flop, 20% Won without Showdown,
When it went to a showdown on these hands, I won only 52%(ouch [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] glad William isn't in my games)

% Raised Pre Flop: 16.91
Aggression Factor: 2.29

So, I am pretty happy with these results. That said, it is early and I am sure many of the other players do not have a good read on me yet.

There are a couple of leaks I am working on right now:

1. This is one T_Perkin mentioned. I like to hammer pots with big hands instead of trying to extract extra chips. I am married to this "win the pot now, no matter what" mentality. Hey, if all you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail! So, I have resolved to look at each of these situations and see if I have the opportunity to grab more chips (sticky fingers again [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img])
2. I do not react well when other players raise and I have decent holdings. I seem to think that small raises are a sign of weakness, so I frequently fire back way too hard. I call too many hands in this situation instead of folding. I have a tendency to "react" (frequently not very well) to this with aggression instead of thinking. It leads to some embarrassing early losses. I now have a note on my monitor that says "slow down when others raise" in big bold letters.
So, off too work on these leaks. Any suggestions here are greatly welcome.

Pitcher
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-01-2004, 01:02 PM
woodguy woodguy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 20
Default Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s

Pitcher,
Looks like you are doing well, I cannot comment further as you are playing well above my level.
I had to respond, because as I read that you had a note on your monitor stating:
"slow down when others raise"
I looked up on my monitor to see my own note : "When raised, I think, I do not react"
The note has helped me slow down and quit making as many "coin-flip" calls as I used to.
What other mental reminders do you use?
Regards,
woodguy
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-01-2004, 01:26 PM
eastbay eastbay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 647
Default Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s

[ QUOTE ]
Hi All,

I posted awhile back about moving up. I wanted to make the move from $50 to $200. I wasn't sure if this was such a great idea, but I had been occassionaly trying these and my results indicated I was not completely outclassed. Because I had such good long term results at the $50 level, I was sure I would be fine. So, here are the 1st. weeks results. This is admittedly not a large enough sample to be statistically valid. Ironically, though, these numbers are very similar to what I was doing at the $50 level. Also, I generally play "1 1/2 games at a time" What that means is that I will be in two games alot. I will start a second game anytime I am not down to heads up in the 1st game because I have a hard time during that period of a tournament concentrating on a second game. Anyway, here are my stats from Poker Tracker

# of tournaments: 44
Net amount won: $4140
Finished in the $: 45.45%
Avg Finish: 4.47
1st. place: 8
2nd place: 4
3rd place: 8


[/ QUOTE ]

If you can maintain that, are you ditching your day job? Or did you do that already?

Pretty phenomenal results. Hope they hold up for you.

eastbay
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-01-2004, 01:47 PM
eastbay eastbay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 647
Default Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s

[ QUOTE ]
Hi All,

I posted awhile back about moving up. I wanted to make the move from $50 to $200. I wasn't sure if this was such a great idea, but I had been occassionaly trying these and my results indicated I was not completely outclassed. Because I had such good long term results at the $50 level, I was sure I would be fine. So, here are the 1st. weeks results. This is admittedly not a large enough sample to be statistically valid. Ironically, though, these numbers are very similar to what I was doing at the $50 level. Also, I generally play "1 1/2 games at a time" What that means is that I will be in two games alot. I will start a second game anytime I am not down to heads up in the 1st game because I have a hard time during that period of a tournament concentrating on a second game. Anyway, here are my stats from Poker Tracker

# of tournaments: 44
Net amount won: $4140
Finished in the $: 45.45%
Avg Finish: 4.47
1st. place: 8
2nd place: 4
3rd place: 8


[/ QUOTE ]

Just for kicks, here are some of my numbers at the $50 level:

# played: 172
Net amt: $2690
Finished in the $: 42%
Avg finish: 4.33
1st,2nd,3rd: 25,22,26

[ QUOTE ]

Over 2590 hands here are some further stats to mull over:

Saw Flop All Hands: 16.22%
Saw Flop Not a Blind: 9.85


[/ QUOTE ]

16.56
9.18

Remarkably similar.

[ QUOTE ]

Hands that I try to Steal on!
Attempt to Steal Blinds (fingers aren't chopped completely off :grin :42.23%
Steal Success: 50% no flop, 20% Won without Showdown,
When it went to a showdown on these hands, I won only 52%(ouch :grin: glad William isn't in my games)


[/ QUOTE ]
Attempted: 33%
59% no flop
64% won w/o SD
29% won at showdown

Looks like I have something to learn here. At what blind level do you start bothering with a steal attempt? I tend to not do much blind stealing until about the 50/100 or 100/200 level, at which point I tend to start going after them very aggressively, often moving in if I have about 10x BB in my stack or less.

The win at showdown #'s appear to say that you're taking blinds with fewer all-ins than me. I lose a lot showdowns because of "only called when beat" scenarios, which isn't necessarily bad, IMO, depending on how much you're making per steal and how often you're going to run into a calling hand.

[ QUOTE ]

% Raised Pre Flop: 16.91
Aggression Factor: 2.29


[/ QUOTE ]

13%
2.58

I think this is indicative of my play as being a little too "all or nothing," too. I am usually quite rockish, playing only premium hands until about the 50/100 or 100/200 levels, at which I point I start moving in pretty liberally until I get doubled through, or grow my stack with blinds. This often catches people off guard at the $50 level. There seem to be two types of reactions:

1) The guys who think an all-in is always a bluff, and will double you up the first time you catch AT or better.

2) The guys who have you pegged as a rock and don't realize how big of an adjustment you've made, and will basically fold you the tournament.

In either case, it's a pretty good scenario. The guys who think every all-in is a bluff are more problematic as they at least threaten to end you even if they call you while behind.

eastbay
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-01-2004, 03:49 PM
PrayingMantis PrayingMantis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 11,600 km from Vegas
Posts: 489
Default Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s

Great results, Pitcher.

Hope you'll keep getting these numbers, also on a larger sample.

I completely identify with what you say about "slow down when others raise", even on the lower buy-in's where I play. A raise infront of me would really make me consider and reconsider if I want to play, even if I hold some very nice hand. This is especially true, after a long series of hands when I was getting dealt garbage. It's very tempting to play your 99, TT, AJ, AQ, but so many times I find myslef behind or a coin-flip with this EP, or MP raiser, so I'm trying to give a good thought about my read of him, and other aspects, before I act.

Good job.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-01-2004, 07:19 PM
jerome baker jerome baker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 109
Default Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s

can you share w/ us how many 55 sng's have u played?
also, waht is your roi for the 55's.
thx.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-01-2004, 08:01 PM
Pitcher Pitcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 135
Default Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s

Hi Jerome,

Over 2400. I averaged 220 per month for 11 months. My ROI was just over 40% with a 44% in the money. Note that my ROI rose slightly over that time and my % in the money dropped slightly (was pegged at 45.9% after 6 months). The reason for this is I started playing just a few more hands early so I could have more chips at the bubble.

Pitcher
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-01-2004, 08:05 PM
Pitcher Pitcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 135
Default Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s

Hi Eastbay,

Yeah, the results are good, but I am only cautiously optimistic. I haven't had the inevitable 6 game slide yet. Also, something really odd occurred on (I believe) Wednesday morning. I got up real early and played several tournaments. During that time I won two. They were the worst played tournaments I had seen in months. It reminded me of a $10 tourney. I was in shock. I have not seen play like that since, so my results may be skewed slightly by that. Even taking those away though, the results are promising.

Pitcher
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-01-2004, 08:14 PM
Pitcher Pitcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 135
Default Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s

Hi Preying Mantis,

I am with you about the results. I hope they hold up.

So I am not the only one around here with that react before thinking mentality! It is reassuring that I am not the only one struggling with this. At the same time, we need to fix it and I think slowing down and carefully evaluating is the only way to do it. I am trying harder and harder to play players instead of hands. I find this difficult at this level because I haven't played much with these players. I quickly need to develop the skill to see how individuals play with limited information. I have tended to focus on the tendencies of the whole table as opposed to individuals. That helps, but it is not enough IMO. Just slowing down should help. One thing I do now is keep my hand off the mouse when others bet. When I hold onto the mouse, I tend to react without thinking more often.

On another front, I will repeat what I said. If you are not playing at the $200 level, you should be (at least on PP). I think you play better than I do based on experience and your posts, so get with it! (unless I have this wrong and you are already are playing this level). I would say the same the Eastbay.

Pitcher
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-01-2004, 08:24 PM
Pitcher Pitcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 135
Default Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s

Hi Woodguy,

I have a poker diary (a running word document) that has a "preparedness" checklist. I go through this list before I play. I have anger issues, so I have a post that says "Respect the Game and the Players. Stay Calm" This helps combat feelings of revenge when someone makes a bad play and beats me. Any anger is a loss of control that must be combatted. That helps. I have one other message and I find this one invaluable:

Don't challenge strong players,
Challenge weak ones
That's what they're there for

This quote by John Vorhaus (Killer Poker) helps me more than any other. If you know a couple of other players on a table are strong capable players, don't tangle with them until you have to at the end! This helps alot!

Pitcher
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.