#1
|
|||
|
|||
1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s
Hi All,
I posted awhile back about moving up. I wanted to make the move from $50 to $200. I wasn't sure if this was such a great idea, but I had been occassionaly trying these and my results indicated I was not completely outclassed. Because I had such good long term results at the $50 level, I was sure I would be fine. So, here are the 1st. weeks results. This is admittedly not a large enough sample to be statistically valid. Ironically, though, these numbers are very similar to what I was doing at the $50 level. Also, I generally play "1 1/2 games at a time" What that means is that I will be in two games alot. I will start a second game anytime I am not down to heads up in the 1st game because I have a hard time during that period of a tournament concentrating on a second game. Anyway, here are my stats from Poker Tracker # of tournaments: 44 Net amount won: $4140 Finished in the $: 45.45% Avg Finish: 4.47 1st. place: 8 2nd place: 4 3rd place: 8 Over 2590 hands here are some further stats to mull over: Saw Flop All Hands: 16.22% Saw Flop Not a Blind: 9.85 Hands that I try to Steal on! Attempt to Steal Blinds (fingers aren't chopped completely off [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]) :42.23% Steal Success: 50% no flop, 20% Won without Showdown, When it went to a showdown on these hands, I won only 52%(ouch [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] glad William isn't in my games) % Raised Pre Flop: 16.91 Aggression Factor: 2.29 So, I am pretty happy with these results. That said, it is early and I am sure many of the other players do not have a good read on me yet. There are a couple of leaks I am working on right now: 1. This is one T_Perkin mentioned. I like to hammer pots with big hands instead of trying to extract extra chips. I am married to this "win the pot now, no matter what" mentality. Hey, if all you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail! So, I have resolved to look at each of these situations and see if I have the opportunity to grab more chips (sticky fingers again [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]) 2. I do not react well when other players raise and I have decent holdings. I seem to think that small raises are a sign of weakness, so I frequently fire back way too hard. I call too many hands in this situation instead of folding. I have a tendency to "react" (frequently not very well) to this with aggression instead of thinking. It leads to some embarrassing early losses. I now have a note on my monitor that says "slow down when others raise" in big bold letters. So, off too work on these leaks. Any suggestions here are greatly welcome. Pitcher |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s
Pitcher,
Looks like you are doing well, I cannot comment further as you are playing well above my level. I had to respond, because as I read that you had a note on your monitor stating: "slow down when others raise" I looked up on my monitor to see my own note : "When raised, I think, I do not react" The note has helped me slow down and quit making as many "coin-flip" calls as I used to. What other mental reminders do you use? Regards, woodguy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s
[ QUOTE ]
Hi All, I posted awhile back about moving up. I wanted to make the move from $50 to $200. I wasn't sure if this was such a great idea, but I had been occassionaly trying these and my results indicated I was not completely outclassed. Because I had such good long term results at the $50 level, I was sure I would be fine. So, here are the 1st. weeks results. This is admittedly not a large enough sample to be statistically valid. Ironically, though, these numbers are very similar to what I was doing at the $50 level. Also, I generally play "1 1/2 games at a time" What that means is that I will be in two games alot. I will start a second game anytime I am not down to heads up in the 1st game because I have a hard time during that period of a tournament concentrating on a second game. Anyway, here are my stats from Poker Tracker # of tournaments: 44 Net amount won: $4140 Finished in the $: 45.45% Avg Finish: 4.47 1st. place: 8 2nd place: 4 3rd place: 8 [/ QUOTE ] If you can maintain that, are you ditching your day job? Or did you do that already? Pretty phenomenal results. Hope they hold up for you. eastbay |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s
[ QUOTE ]
Hi All, I posted awhile back about moving up. I wanted to make the move from $50 to $200. I wasn't sure if this was such a great idea, but I had been occassionaly trying these and my results indicated I was not completely outclassed. Because I had such good long term results at the $50 level, I was sure I would be fine. So, here are the 1st. weeks results. This is admittedly not a large enough sample to be statistically valid. Ironically, though, these numbers are very similar to what I was doing at the $50 level. Also, I generally play "1 1/2 games at a time" What that means is that I will be in two games alot. I will start a second game anytime I am not down to heads up in the 1st game because I have a hard time during that period of a tournament concentrating on a second game. Anyway, here are my stats from Poker Tracker # of tournaments: 44 Net amount won: $4140 Finished in the $: 45.45% Avg Finish: 4.47 1st. place: 8 2nd place: 4 3rd place: 8 [/ QUOTE ] Just for kicks, here are some of my numbers at the $50 level: # played: 172 Net amt: $2690 Finished in the $: 42% Avg finish: 4.33 1st,2nd,3rd: 25,22,26 [ QUOTE ] Over 2590 hands here are some further stats to mull over: Saw Flop All Hands: 16.22% Saw Flop Not a Blind: 9.85 [/ QUOTE ] 16.56 9.18 Remarkably similar. [ QUOTE ] Hands that I try to Steal on! Attempt to Steal Blinds (fingers aren't chopped completely off :grin :42.23% Steal Success: 50% no flop, 20% Won without Showdown, When it went to a showdown on these hands, I won only 52%(ouch :grin: glad William isn't in my games) [/ QUOTE ] Attempted: 33% 59% no flop 64% won w/o SD 29% won at showdown Looks like I have something to learn here. At what blind level do you start bothering with a steal attempt? I tend to not do much blind stealing until about the 50/100 or 100/200 level, at which point I tend to start going after them very aggressively, often moving in if I have about 10x BB in my stack or less. The win at showdown #'s appear to say that you're taking blinds with fewer all-ins than me. I lose a lot showdowns because of "only called when beat" scenarios, which isn't necessarily bad, IMO, depending on how much you're making per steal and how often you're going to run into a calling hand. [ QUOTE ] % Raised Pre Flop: 16.91 Aggression Factor: 2.29 [/ QUOTE ] 13% 2.58 I think this is indicative of my play as being a little too "all or nothing," too. I am usually quite rockish, playing only premium hands until about the 50/100 or 100/200 levels, at which I point I start moving in pretty liberally until I get doubled through, or grow my stack with blinds. This often catches people off guard at the $50 level. There seem to be two types of reactions: 1) The guys who think an all-in is always a bluff, and will double you up the first time you catch AT or better. 2) The guys who have you pegged as a rock and don't realize how big of an adjustment you've made, and will basically fold you the tournament. In either case, it's a pretty good scenario. The guys who think every all-in is a bluff are more problematic as they at least threaten to end you even if they call you while behind. eastbay |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s
Great results, Pitcher.
Hope you'll keep getting these numbers, also on a larger sample. I completely identify with what you say about "slow down when others raise", even on the lower buy-in's where I play. A raise infront of me would really make me consider and reconsider if I want to play, even if I hold some very nice hand. This is especially true, after a long series of hands when I was getting dealt garbage. It's very tempting to play your 99, TT, AJ, AQ, but so many times I find myslef behind or a coin-flip with this EP, or MP raiser, so I'm trying to give a good thought about my read of him, and other aspects, before I act. Good job. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s
can you share w/ us how many 55 sng's have u played?
also, waht is your roi for the 55's. thx. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s
Hi Jerome,
Over 2400. I averaged 220 per month for 11 months. My ROI was just over 40% with a 44% in the money. Note that my ROI rose slightly over that time and my % in the money dropped slightly (was pegged at 45.9% after 6 months). The reason for this is I started playing just a few more hands early so I could have more chips at the bubble. Pitcher |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s
Hi Eastbay,
Yeah, the results are good, but I am only cautiously optimistic. I haven't had the inevitable 6 game slide yet. Also, something really odd occurred on (I believe) Wednesday morning. I got up real early and played several tournaments. During that time I won two. They were the worst played tournaments I had seen in months. It reminded me of a $10 tourney. I was in shock. I have not seen play like that since, so my results may be skewed slightly by that. Even taking those away though, the results are promising. Pitcher |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s
Hi Preying Mantis,
I am with you about the results. I hope they hold up. So I am not the only one around here with that react before thinking mentality! It is reassuring that I am not the only one struggling with this. At the same time, we need to fix it and I think slowing down and carefully evaluating is the only way to do it. I am trying harder and harder to play players instead of hands. I find this difficult at this level because I haven't played much with these players. I quickly need to develop the skill to see how individuals play with limited information. I have tended to focus on the tendencies of the whole table as opposed to individuals. That helps, but it is not enough IMO. Just slowing down should help. One thing I do now is keep my hand off the mouse when others bet. When I hold onto the mouse, I tend to react without thinking more often. On another front, I will repeat what I said. If you are not playing at the $200 level, you should be (at least on PP). I think you play better than I do based on experience and your posts, so get with it! (unless I have this wrong and you are already are playing this level). I would say the same the Eastbay. Pitcher |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1st weeks results for $200 Sit N Go\'s
Hi Woodguy,
I have a poker diary (a running word document) that has a "preparedness" checklist. I go through this list before I play. I have anger issues, so I have a post that says "Respect the Game and the Players. Stay Calm" This helps combat feelings of revenge when someone makes a bad play and beats me. Any anger is a loss of control that must be combatted. That helps. I have one other message and I find this one invaluable: Don't challenge strong players, Challenge weak ones That's what they're there for This quote by John Vorhaus (Killer Poker) helps me more than any other. If you know a couple of other players on a table are strong capable players, don't tangle with them until you have to at the end! This helps alot! Pitcher |
|
|