Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2005, 10:27 AM
kongo_totte kongo_totte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tullinge, sweden
Posts: 491
Default AA vs. LAG.

Villian is 50/18 after 50 hands and quite aggressive post-flop aswell. I haven't seen him to anything completely donktastic though.

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (10 handed) converter

MP3 ($16.60)
CO ($65.80)
Button ($46.35)
SB ($43)
BB ($57.98)
UTG ($85.80)
Hero ($68.10)
UTG+2 ($64.40)
MP1 ($58.75)
MP2 ($69.45)

Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.25.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $2</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP1 calls $2, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, SB (poster) calls $1.75, BB calls $1.50.

Flop: ($8) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $7</font>, MP1 calls $7, SB folds, BB folds.

Turn: ($22) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 bets $15</font>, Hero calls $15.

River: ($52) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $15</font>

Is it right to let him bet it for me on the turn, or should I just valuebet vs. the lag?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2005, 10:39 AM
fuzzbox fuzzbox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: AA vs. LAG.

Are you planning to call a push on the end ?

I dont mind check/call, but if I check/call turn then I usually check/call river too. We dont want to scare him if he has QQ.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2005, 10:45 AM
kongo_totte kongo_totte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tullinge, sweden
Posts: 491
Default Re: AA vs. LAG.

I intended to fold to a river push (am I going to be flamed for this?). With his VP$IP, he could just as easila have K 2 as Q Q.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2005, 10:47 AM
fuzzbox fuzzbox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: AA vs. LAG.

[ QUOTE ]
I intended to fold to a river push (am I going to be flamed for this?). With his VP$IP, he could just as easila have K 2 as Q Q.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont think that betting 15 will stop him from pushing if he is bluffing - do you ?

It would make me *more* likely to push as a bluff.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2005, 10:58 AM
Ghazban Ghazban is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1
Default Re: AA vs. LAG.

I hate the size of your river bet. After check/calling the turn, I'd probably check/call the river. Alternatively, I bet the turn and check/call the river. Leading the river so weakly is just asking a LAG to bluffraise you.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2005, 11:09 AM
kongo_totte kongo_totte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tullinge, sweden
Posts: 491
Default Re: AA vs. LAG.

[ QUOTE ]
Leading the river so weakly is just asking a LAG to bluffraise you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then, the right play should be to lead semi-weakly as I did and call a push, shouldn't it.

Actually, I had not really decided if I would call or fold to a push on the river, which of course is bad.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2005, 11:20 AM
jkkkk jkkkk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Making moves in weak-tight land.
Posts: 637
Default Re: AA vs. LAG.

I lead each street with someone that is this loose, theres a good chance he will call down with Kx
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2005, 11:22 AM
xorbie xorbie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,828
Default Re: AA vs. LAG.

Limp reraise PF? Mmmmm. Works for more often with KK though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-17-2005, 11:23 AM
Ghazban Ghazban is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1
Default Re: AA vs. LAG.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Leading the river so weakly is just asking a LAG to bluffraise you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then, the right play should be to lead semi-weakly as I did and call a push, shouldn't it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Or make a normal sized bet (1/2 pot or so) and call a push or check/call any bet. Against a loose player, you will certainly be good often enough to put the money in on this river. The effective stack depths at this point make it a must-showdown hand. If you both had $200 behind, the river could be more interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-17-2005, 11:26 AM
djoyce003 djoyce003 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 139
Default Re: AA vs. LAG.

I would lead a little more than you did for value with the intention of calling a push.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.