#1
|
|||
|
|||
AA vs. LAG.
Villian is 50/18 after 50 hands and quite aggressive post-flop aswell. I haven't seen him to anything completely donktastic though.
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (10 handed) converter MP3 ($16.60) CO ($65.80) Button ($46.35) SB ($43) BB ($57.98) UTG ($85.80) Hero ($68.10) UTG+2 ($64.40) MP1 ($58.75) MP2 ($69.45) Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.25. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $2</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP1 calls $2, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, SB (poster) calls $1.75, BB calls $1.50. Flop: ($8) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font> SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $7</font>, MP1 calls $7, SB folds, BB folds. Turn: ($22) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 bets $15</font>, Hero calls $15. River: ($52) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $15</font> Is it right to let him bet it for me on the turn, or should I just valuebet vs. the lag? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA vs. LAG.
Are you planning to call a push on the end ?
I dont mind check/call, but if I check/call turn then I usually check/call river too. We dont want to scare him if he has QQ. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA vs. LAG.
I intended to fold to a river push (am I going to be flamed for this?). With his VP$IP, he could just as easila have K 2 as Q Q.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA vs. LAG.
[ QUOTE ]
I intended to fold to a river push (am I going to be flamed for this?). With his VP$IP, he could just as easila have K 2 as Q Q. [/ QUOTE ] I dont think that betting 15 will stop him from pushing if he is bluffing - do you ? It would make me *more* likely to push as a bluff. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA vs. LAG.
I hate the size of your river bet. After check/calling the turn, I'd probably check/call the river. Alternatively, I bet the turn and check/call the river. Leading the river so weakly is just asking a LAG to bluffraise you.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA vs. LAG.
[ QUOTE ]
Leading the river so weakly is just asking a LAG to bluffraise you. [/ QUOTE ] Then, the right play should be to lead semi-weakly as I did and call a push, shouldn't it. Actually, I had not really decided if I would call or fold to a push on the river, which of course is bad. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA vs. LAG.
I lead each street with someone that is this loose, theres a good chance he will call down with Kx
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA vs. LAG.
Limp reraise PF? Mmmmm. Works for more often with KK though.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA vs. LAG.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Leading the river so weakly is just asking a LAG to bluffraise you. [/ QUOTE ] Then, the right play should be to lead semi-weakly as I did and call a push, shouldn't it. [/ QUOTE ] Or make a normal sized bet (1/2 pot or so) and call a push or check/call any bet. Against a loose player, you will certainly be good often enough to put the money in on this river. The effective stack depths at this point make it a must-showdown hand. If you both had $200 behind, the river could be more interesting. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA vs. LAG.
I would lead a little more than you did for value with the intention of calling a push.
|
|
|