Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-23-2004, 01:51 AM
Nemesis Nemesis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 79
Default Counting overcards as partial outs.

In SSHE Ed seems to advocate in most situations your 2 overcards to the flop are in general about .5 outs per card so 2 overcards to the flop is only 3 outs thus you need a fairly large pot to continue drawing to them. It seems to me on a ragedy flop if YOU are playing the premium hands that your outs are dirty much less than half the time. Am i just being overly optomistic?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-23-2004, 02:07 AM
imitation imitation is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 560
Default Re: Counting overcards as partial outs.

This is an interesting idea but surely in a smaller pot your overcard outs are cleaner because it's less likely to make someone 2Pair.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2004, 10:32 AM
Octopus Octopus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: working on my dissertation
Posts: 143
Default Re: Counting overcards as partial outs.

You allude to the answer. If the flop is raggedy, your outs are worth more. Also if you have few opponents, they are worth more.

Having said that, I can not recall a point in the book where he gives more than half an out to an overcard. I can think of one arguement in favor of such conservatism: If you are reverse dominated you are likely to lose a bet or two more when you hit than you will win in those cases where you are not. If that is the case then you should count the outs less highly than the true probability that they are tainted.

And, as always, it depends. If you opponents are any ace types, then your overcards are worth relatively less than if they are just any two suited types (or any two cards types [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]).

(NOTE: I am typing this as I think about it, so I could be missing something obvious.)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2004, 11:23 AM
tardigrade tardigrade is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: 1/2 Party
Posts: 243
Default Re: Counting overcards as partial outs.

[ QUOTE ]
And, as always, it depends. If you opponents are any ace types, then your overcards are worth relatively less than if they are just any two suited types (or any two cards types [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]).

[/ QUOTE ]

I wish I had SSHE to read about this, but I'm starting to learn the above lesson. With your AK over a 742 rainbow flop in a tough game, you're golden. But at the best micro tables, your A or K outs can easily make someone else two pair if they're still in when you catch.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-23-2004, 12:34 PM
Octopus Octopus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: working on my dissertation
Posts: 143
Default Re: Counting overcards as partial outs.

[ QUOTE ]
I wish I had SSHE to read about this, but I'm starting to learn the above lesson. With your AK over a 742 rainbow flop in a tough game, you're golden. But at the best micro tables, your A or K outs can easily make someone else two pair if they're still in when you catch.

[/ QUOTE ]

At the best tables, someone has a gutshot to the nut straight on that flop. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

I can not recommend SSH more highly. There is material there I had never thought about (e.g. Finding Hidden Outs, pp108-112) and a lot which is much clearer to me having read it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.