Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-03-2005, 01:31 AM
Myst Myst is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Default 99 Early

#Game No : 2146347529
***** Hand History for Game 2146347529 *****
NL Hold'em $20 Buy-in + $2 Entry Fee Trny:12763828 Level:1 Blinds(10/15) - Friday, June 03, 00:23:15 EDT 2005
Table Table 15036 (Real Money)
Seat 2 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: stivodagreat ( $695 )
Seat 2: Mystraised ( $715 )
Seat 3: Izzyblughin ( $770 )
Seat 4: JEBAC11 ( $845 )
Seat 5: eaglez07 ( $1690 )
Seat 6: tcarterman ( $670 )
Seat 8: bebekids ( $785 )
Seat 9: Qdogg51 ( $865 )
Seat 10: bobbycroix ( $965 )
Trny:12763828 Level:1
Blinds(10/15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Mystraised [ 9d 9c ]
eaglez07 folds.
>You have options at Table 15032 Table!.
tcarterman calls [15].
bebekids calls [15].
Qdogg51 folds.
bobbycroix folds.
stivodagreat raises [30].
Mystraised calls [30].
Izzyblughin folds.
JEBAC11 calls [15].
>You have options at Table 13809 Table!.
tcarterman calls [15].
bebekids calls [15].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 7s, 2d, 4d ]
JEBAC11 checks.
tcarterman checks.
>You have options at Table 13809 Table!.
bebekids bets [75].
stivodagreat calls [75].
Mystraised is all-In [685]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-03-2005, 01:34 AM
citanul citanul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 64
Default Re: 99 Early

i haven't played any 22s lately, but this doesn't look great to me. i dunno. i hate folding overpairs as much as the next guy, but "no set, no..." you've got 4 opponents, any of whom could easilly have a set. that's a big problem. i dunno, play could be fine, but i don't think i'd do it. i'd just fold on the flop like the sissy i am with a field this large.

citanul
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-03-2005, 02:06 AM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 766
Default Re: 99 Early

You play 109's. This is a $22. Your opponents are far too liable to suck here for you to lay an overpair down here to somewhat little strength. With t300 in the pot, I like the push.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-03-2005, 02:11 AM
jgunnip jgunnip is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 14
Default Re: 99 Early

Generally I call min-raises with TT but not 88. I think 99 is kind of a either or (fold or call) for me. Sometimes I like to play 99 in flop situations like yours, with an over pair, which is why I'll sometimes call a small raise PF, however I don't like having this many opponents. And so being that there are already too many oppoents for my liking in the pot, I would fold this before the flop and defintely in your situation after the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-03-2005, 02:12 AM
citanul citanul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 64
Default Re: 99 Early

you should be calling a miniraise at lvl 1 particularly, with any pocket pair, especially if there are other players in the pot.

citanul
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-03-2005, 02:56 AM
jgunnip jgunnip is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 14
Default Re: 99 Early

I know that's the general concensus here and I do with any PP if I can close the action, but I feel if I'm going to invest more than 15 chips I like to have at least some overpair strength.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-03-2005, 03:05 AM
citanul citanul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 64
Default Re: 99 Early

this is a very bad attitude. you should try it out, at least for a week, trying to play small pairs early and cheap.

citanul
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-03-2005, 03:07 AM
Phill S Phill S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nr Manchester, England
Posts: 255
Default Re: 99 Early

Baah. Id cry if you were playing with my money.

Its called weak-tight for a reason.

Phill
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-03-2005, 03:41 AM
jgunnip jgunnip is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 14
Default Re: 99 Early

I'm very open to trying this. I just hate when I call min-raise or limp and then call the min-raise only for it to get re-min-raised. I'll always in this situation but yeah, I suppose my thinking is that if I put a limit on my PF middle/low PP invest to the pot to the BB, then I can avoid these other situations all together. My intuition says your response will be that these other situations I'm avoiding are most likely negligible to my ROI.

I also don't open limp with 66 or less in the early level. At least one limper and sometimes two if I'm in LP. Yeah, I'm very weak-tight early with PP but what gives. I'm playing the 11s know and I can give up these opportunities now for better ones a round or two down the line.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-03-2005, 04:21 AM
pergesu pergesu is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: 99 Early

Doesn't happen a ton. Don't let selective memory scare you.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.