Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2004, 09:37 AM
bunky9590 bunky9590 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,188
Default Weak 50NL at Prima. Checking my aggression level

2 hands to make sure I am okay with my NL ring game skills.
(I've been away for a while in limitsville)

A6o in BB. 2 limpers. I have $25. both players have me covered.

Flop comes T 6 2 rainbow. I bet $2.50, 1 fold 1 caller.
Turn 6 I bet $7.50 he folds.

AQs small blind, 4 limpers to me I have $28.00, I make it $3.00 to go, I caller ( big stack at table but very weak)
Flop comes J 9 4 (2 hearts, I have none) I bet $7.00 he folds.

K4d BB. I have $35.00 3 limpers, I check. Flop comes 3 diamonds no str8 flush potential. I bet $3.00 2 folds, button raises to 10 ( I have him well covered), I push in, he calls , shows Q8d.

These plays pretty automatic? Standard procedure right?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-17-2004, 03:05 PM
bunky9590 bunky9590 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,188
Default Re: Quick responses anyone? N/M

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-17-2004, 03:20 PM
Mike Gallo Mike Gallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,765
Default Re: Weak 50NL at Prima. Checking my aggression level

Bunky,

All hands look good to me.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-17-2004, 06:07 PM
bunky9590 bunky9590 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,188
Default Re: Weak 50NL at Prima. Checking my aggression level

Yeah, I thought they were pretty automatic, especially for the aggressive style I play. They did clearly look like value bets.

The flush hand I literally said out loud, If you have the A High flush, you're gonna win a big pot! He didn't, I got paid!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-17-2004, 06:44 PM
The Bear The Bear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 239
Default Re: Weak 50NL at Prima. Checking my aggression level

1) I would sometimes try to check-raise the turn. Most of the time, I would play it like you.

3) I'd split my decisions between betting out and check-raising. Once you get raised, it's an easy all-in.

2) I'm not sure I like the way you played the AQs. You say there are 4 limpers to you, which means there is $5.50 in the pot (after both blinds). If you are going to raise, you need to make it something like $6 to go. $3 is simply too small, as it prices everyone in to the pot. You're lucky you didn't get called in multiple places. If you do get called in 3 spots there, you have a real tricky flop decision if you miss.

I often don't raise limpers with this hand from the SB. Yes, I understand that you're raising for value, but playing big cards out of position in no-limit is not a spot I want to be in. My default play here is to call up and check-raise the flop if I hit it. Of course, on the button, I'd raise nearly every time.

I'd be interested in what others have to say about the AQs.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-17-2004, 08:03 PM
scrub scrub is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 573
Default Re: Weak 50NL at Prima. Checking my aggression level

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure I like the way you played the AQs. You say there are 4 limpers to you, which means there is $5.50 in the pot (after both blinds). If you are going to raise, you need to make it something like $6 to go. $3 is simply too small, as it prices everyone in to the pot. You're lucky you didn't get called in multiple places. If you do get called in 3 spots there, you have a real tricky flop decision if you miss.

I often don't raise limpers with this hand from the SB. Yes, I understand that you're raising for value, but playing big cards out of position in no-limit is not a spot I want to be in. My default play here is to call up and check-raise the flop if I hit it. Of course, on the button, I'd raise nearly every time.

I'd be interested in what others have to say about the AQs.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't like the AQs raise. The AQ aspect of the hand sucks to play out of position, and it sucks to play in a big pot. With AQ, I think you make a lot more money getting payed off by smaller aces than you do by collecting the flop raise when you hit and losing a BIG flop bet and maybe more when you miss and/or hit and are beaten.

The suited ace aspect of this hand plays great just fine against a ton of limpers. Particularly when a raise hasn't hurt its implied odds and forced it to call a larger bet relative to stack size on the flop while drawing. I know putting in a raise against a ton of limpers with a AXs is a decent play in a loose limit game, but I don't think it's such a great play NL.

There was a thread recently about playing AKo UTG. I think the qualms some players had about playing AKo in a big pot from up front are even more important when playing AQ from SB against a lot of limpers. Particularly when your raise was small enough that it's likely effect was to build the pot without limiting the field...

Against an extremely weak-tight table, I might be tempted to put in a big raise against all of that limped money. But even then, I'm not sure that AQ are the cards I want to be holding when I get called. I would hate hitting the flop and getting called. I'd be more inclined to make this raise with a hand that was either stronger or weaker. Either way, it's easier for me to play on the flop and beyond when I get action.

Good luck, buddy!

scrub
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.