Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2005, 11:36 PM
Karak567 Karak567 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16
Default KK vs ultra LAG 200 1/2

The villain is as LAG as they get. He bluffs endlessly at almost every single pot, he is a HUGE calling station and has called me down with K high three times now.

How do you play out this hand?

***** Hand History for Game 2742194520 *****
$200 NL Texas Hold'em - Monday, September 19, 23:35:06 EDT 2005
Table Table 36640 (6 max) (Real Money)
Seat 2 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 1: Ehlers33 ( $284.95 )
Seat 4: KardonSeph ( $295.70 )
Seat 6: bbeyl ( $312.85 )
Seat 3: GimmyTheLoot ( $214.93 )
Seat 5: sugarwolf28 ( $75.65 )
Seat 2: Trader4LiFE ( $202.55 )
GimmyTheLoot posts small blind [$1].
KardonSeph posts big blind [$2].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to KardonSeph [ Ks Kh ]
>You have options at Table 55657 (6 max) (No DP) Table!.
sugarwolf28 folds.
Ehlers33 folds.
Trader4LiFE folds.
GimmyTheLoot calls [$1].
KardonSeph raises [$4].
GimmyTheLoot calls [$4].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 9h, 5c, 7c ]
GimmyTheLoot checks.
KardonSeph bets [$6].
GimmyTheLoot raises [$20].
KardonSeph raises [$34].
GimmyTheLoot calls [$20].
** Dealing Turn ** [ 4c ]
GimmyTheLoot checks.
KardonSeph bets [$45].
GimmyTheLoot calls [$45].
** Dealing River ** [ 2c ]
>You have options at Table 55657 (6 max) (No DP) Table!.
GimmyTheLoot is all-In [$123.93]
KardonSeph folds.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-19-2005, 11:47 PM
Simplistic Simplistic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 380
Default Re: KK vs ultra LAG 200 1/2

make your decisions easier, re-raise more on the flop, and get your money in on the turn if you think you're ahead.

is he pretty passive and that's why you folded the river?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-19-2005, 11:50 PM
Karak567 Karak567 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16
Default Re: KK vs ultra LAG 200 1/2

He isn't passive.

I folded the river because of the 4 flush out there.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-20-2005, 12:05 AM
Matt R. Matt R. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 351
Default Re: KK vs ultra LAG 200 1/2

I think against this type of opponent you need to raise a LOT more on the flop, and get as much money in as possible as you figure to be way ahead. I'd go with a full pot sized re-raise, or even more. Not so good at deciphering raises and stuff in the party poker HH's, but I think this would be like around a ~$70 total bet. The 3rd club on the board is scary, but I think you need to bet big again against this type of player, as there's no reason to think he's holding 2 clubs when it's HU (plus, with the way you describe him, he probably would have pushed his flush draw after your re-raise). Anyway... assuming he calls your $70 re-raise, you almost would need to push the turn as potting it again would pot commit villain if he just calls, so you may as well push anyway if he's willing to call you down with king high.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.