#1
|
|||
|
|||
PokerGrapher
I know PG is no longer being developed or supported but perhaps someone could give me a hint as to what is wrong here.
Works fine for me but I set a friend up with it last night specifically for the easy rake calc. He has 2 aliases at Empire - the 2nd is his wife. Totally above board. They never play together. When we did the rake calc for last month the PG figures for games played by both aliases were higher than what was in the PT database. I don't have the exact numbers in front of me but it was something like 2000 hands total. They only played at 2 limits. We had both enabled in PT. The PT numbers btw coincide with what Tradal/Empire reports so it is definetly PG that is wrong. How can PG find 2000 extra hands in PT when PT says they don't exist? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerGrapher
maybe diff databases somewhere?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerGrapher
I believe PG only considers one db at a time but in any event he only used one db last month. Thanks though
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerGrapher
PG sometimes adds an extra day on the end, I'm not sure why. If you cut the date range back by one you should get the right results.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerGrapher
Thanks. I'll get him to give that a shot tonight but I don't think he's played 2000 hands this month let alone July 1st. I think as a matter of fact he was out of town July 1 and didn't play at all.
I'll muck with the ranges a bit though and see if anything gets close. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerGrapher
Tried the cut a day thing and sure enough it worked. Did a range of June 1 - June 29 and it gave a correct figure. Bizzare. Thanks again.
|
|
|