Re: ICM: Does it match the results?
[ QUOTE ]
This sort of thing usually gets pretty subjective and controversial, but IMO it's pretty nice to have a starting point for expert discussion, rather than just a bunch of assertions about the right play, which is what prevailed on this forum for quite some time before Bozeman came along and led the way with this kind of quantitative approach.
[/ QUOTE ]
Though pre-ICM is before my time, I definitely agree that having something quantitative that seems to give decent results is a big plus. The quantitative bent that 2+2 has is definitely what got me interested in the place and is the strongest thing it has going for it, to my mind.
[ QUOTE ]
PS I have an idea about how to approach the subject from another direction. If I ever free up enough time to try my idea, I'll probably share it. Maybe. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
[/ QUOTE ]
My interest is piqued.
|