[karlson]

Sure. You could use some kind of ICM evaluation instead. It wouldn't be even be that hard.

But I'm kind of skeptical of the value. Chances are that your opponent's estimates of your hand range are going to make your decision right/wrong much more than any difference between CEV and $EV.

The original exercise was meant mostly as a demonstration that moving all-in is certainly right in a lot more situations than people admit. The fact that you would move in even if you flipped your cards face up is likely to more than counterbalance any extra considerations from non-chip-count tournament equity, unless the stacks are absolutely extreme.