[Marm]

3 things that noticed that raised my eyebrow a little:

1) There are no big losers the second chart. AA has an EV of 2.32 bb, while the worst hand there 32s, only has a -.15 bb EV. This doesnt sit right with me, don't know what though.

2) There are almsot identical occurences of AJs as 32s, so obviously they are counting times dealt, not flops seen. So how can you asign a EV to a folded hand that was never played? maybe thats why the (-) Ev is so small, people just don't lose that much with them because they don't play them.

3) How are some of the unsuited hands more profitable than the suited hands? Not much but enough. 32 is -.14 and 32s is -.15. THe suited hand should be more profitable intuition tells me. But maybe its because the suited gets played more than unsuited, and as such, loses more.


I like the concept of this study. Not sure on the accuracy of this, though.

Just my ramblings