Nitpicking: You left out a constant in your 95% confidence interval arithmetic. Should be:
95% CI = 8.5 +/-
1.96*(18.6/sqrt(70))
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I got the std. dev. numbers from the sessions tab in PT. It seems like everyone in the small stakes forum thinks 14-15BB/100 is a good normal standard deviation, though I suppose if I'm running well and/or at a higher average BB/100 rate it will be higher.
[/ QUOTE ]
That would be excellent. 17 times the win rate in bb/100 is good.
[/ QUOTE ]
Wondering: are you saying here that 14-15 BB/100 is excellent and that anything <17xWR is good? Or is that greater than?
Reasons I'm asking:
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] The same players reporting SD ~15 BB/100 are also reporting WR ~3BB/100. Well, I assume they are the same or similar players-- here are some links:
SS SD
SS WR
!Edit: hard to tell what the actual average is. Probably between 2 and 3 BB/100.
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Although I'd like a low SD and high WR, a lower than normal SD seems correlated with running bad. See
pzhon's post here.