thats 3 out of the last 4.
Last week just being a slight blip in my ongoing crushing of the tuesday night 2+2 event. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
1: ByronKincaid (Carshalton), $72.00 (40%)
2: photoman23 (Lecanto), $54.00 (30%)
3: TheStrength (Penarth), $36.00 (20%)
4: fashidus (DALLAS), $18.00 (10%)
5: debaser (Buckingham),
6: ButterBaby1 (Iowa City),
7: Stone_Eyes (Bangor),
8: stryteller (Clarence),
9: KURN (Cranston),
10: Bozeman (Bozeman),
11: DrPhysic (San Antonio),
12: max64 (udine),
13: HelmetSky (Ramat-Gan),
14: EWCRAPS0710 (brooklyn),
15: Ruddiger (Sammamish),
16: spike_tt (Swindon),
17: MobyDick (København),
18: alksdjflk023 (Marquette),
You finished in 1st place (eliminated at hand #338283082).
124 hands played and saw flop:
- 9 times out of 23 while in small blind (39%)
- 8 times out of 23 while in big blind (34%)
- 7 times out of 78 in other positions (8%)
- a total of 24 times out of 124 (19%)
Pots won at showdown - 9 out of 10 (90%)
Pots won without showdown - 20
I've left my stats on to give you guys a clue [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Interesting hands, well the ones that spring to mind are William reraising with AQ getting raised again and losing to KK.
Kurn going all in with 10 10 and losing to AJ. And the one which changed the tourney for me was raising with AJ against chip leader photoman, he calls and we get a flop of 33A. I make a pot sized bet and he calls, I can't remember the next 2 cards but he ended up calling my all in bet and he had 66. After that I just caught a run of fantastic cards and couldn't lose really.
So it's interesting (to me anyway) that after 89 logged $22's at stars I have an ROI of 14% and after 30 $33's at party I have an even worse ROI of 9%. Yet put me up against better players (majority of you guys) and I can't lose.
What I'm hoping is that I play my A game on a Tuesday and worse in my normal games. I don't for example surf the web, watch TV or multi table at the 2+2 games, all of which I have been do at the same time. Or it could just be dumb luck, probably.
|