[Dan Rutter]

After thinking more about it, I think it is only profitable if you know your opponent will bet if he hits his draw, or does not hit it. He has to bet this hand if he hits or not, frequently enough that you will make profit because he is bluffing to much. So against an average opponent do you think it is wise at all to call him, and see if he is bluffing, or should you just fold in this situation everytime. So basically, if this situation occured a thousand times you would show profit by check-calling your opponent everytime if you knew he would bet everytime, if he did not complete a draw and when he completed it. How do you know against a specific opponent to play your hand though, based on the 2 to 1 pot odds? You do not know if he bets when he missed everytime, or not, if you do not call him to see how he plays in that situation. I hope this question makes somewhat sense.