Thread: Dynasty
View Single Post
  #63  
Old 02-07-2005, 05:32 PM
Alobar Alobar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 795
Default Re: Dynasty

[ QUOTE ]


Way off base. The fact is that it is much easier in the NBA. Why? Because instead of 24 relevant starting players, there are only 5. One player in the NBA has a massively disproportionate impact on the game. Note this is also why upsets are far more prevalent in NCAA basketball than in NCAA football. Small schools can get lucky with one or two awesome players in basketball which enables them to hang with the big boys. In football, however, this isn't the case as a few lucky recruits aren't nearly enough to overcome the sheer volume of talent that the big time programs get.

Michael Jordan was not only on the floor for 90% of the time in games he played in, he was on both the offensive and defensive end, and constituted 20% of his teams players on the floor. Compare that to an NFL starter who is on the floor for roughly 50% of a game and is 9% of his team's total on the field. You need much more depth and balance to win in the NFL. Couple that with the higher injury risk and shorter career span and it becomes obvious why NBA teams are able compete and dominate for prolonged periods of time while NFL teams rarely have a window longer than 3-4 years

[/ QUOTE ]

actually, that makes a ton of sense, I never had thought of it like that. Your answer is obviously the far superior one.
Reply With Quote