[Al Schoonmaker]

I don't see the link. I clicked on "poki," and nothing happened. I'd like to know how to get to that article or any others on this general subject.

A few months ago I argued in Poker Digest that computers would soon beat champions at limit poker. Most of my friends disagree, but chess players said the same about computers and chess. Poker players insist that poker is somehow different and more complicated than chess or other activities at which computers have demonstrated their superiority, but they are kidding themselves. Poker is NOT that different.

The incomplete information issue is nonsense. Computers destroy people at Rock, Scissor, Paper, which is also a game of incomplete information. In fact, the only thing that counts is reading the other player. Computers can read you MUCH better than you can read them.

I'd appreciate links to any articles on this subject.

Thanks,

Al