Re: A few hands for the baby bluffers (long)
[ QUOTE ]
I was considering check-raise bluffing this hand, but the size of this opponent's bet made me think he had a real hand (though I had caught him bluffing before). I ran the clock down on this one.
Seat 4: ThreeProngs ($4,422 in chips)
Seat 5: KIonizer ($4,346 in chips)
Seat 6: durron597 [ Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img],10[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ] ($6,232 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS
KIonizer posts blind ($150), durron597 posts blind ($300).
PRE-FLOP
ThreeProngs calls $300, KIonizer calls $150, durron597 checks.
FLOP [board cards A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img],4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img],Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ]
KIonizer checks, durron597 checks, ThreeProngs bets $550, KIonizer folds, durron597 folds.
SHOWDOWN
ThreeProngs wins $1,450
SUMMARY
Dealer: ThreeProngs
Pot: $1,450 | Rake: $0
ThreeProngs bets $850, collects $1,450I d, net $600
KIonizer loses $300
durron597 loses $300
Don't be afraid to abort a planned bluff. I expected this player to bet when checked to, but then he bet a lot more than I was expecting; I would be very surprised if he didn't have an ace.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't agree with this hand at all. The button makes a 1/2 pot bet on the flop after the 2 limpers check to him. I'd make this bet with garbage to represent the ace. What makes you think he has an ace?
You have 2nd pair in a 3-handed game and you check-fold?
This must be read-dependent because it's looks really weak to me.
|