LuvDemNutz
stranger
Reged: 06/18/04
Posts: 13
|
|
I just got this email from my PokerNow affiliate. Can anyone substantiate the part about affiliates not being able to track INDIVIDUAL rake stats.
"We regret to inform you that the PokerNOW rake back
plan is officially over.
PokerNOW has become a fully fledged part of Party
Poker and all current PokerNOW Affiliate Agreements
have been terminated. Luckily, PokerNOW did keep
their word and has paid us for February so you will
receive that money by this Friday (4/29/05).
Unfortunately, this also means that there will be no
future payments towards your PokerNOW rake back plan.
Party/IGM has also taken the next step towards their
goal of completely eliminating rake back at all the
skins. Party recently started withholding affiliate
stats on individual trackers. This means there is no
possible way for a Party affiliate to tell how much
rake each individual player has generated.
We currently have affiliate agreements with Eurobet
and Empire Poker, but truly believe that Party/IGM
will definitely be putting a stop to rake back at all
the skins very soon. For this reason we are hesitant
to sign-up alot of our PokerNOW players at Eurobet and
Empire, just to have the same situation happen.
That being said, please let us know if you still want
to sign-up for Eurobet and/or Empire to keep receiving
Party/IGM skin rake back for however long it does
last. We will consider your request on an individual
basis and accept a limited number of new sign-ups....."
Edited by LuvDemNutz (04/27/05 01:45 PM)
|
Wyers
stranger
Reged: 07/29/04
Posts: 20
|
|
Quote:
That being said, please let us know if you still want
to sign-up for Eurobet and/or Empire to keep receiving
Party/IGM skin rake back for however long it does
last. We will consider your request on an individual
basis and accept a limited number of new sign-ups....."
Reeks of scare mongering in an attempt to drum up new business.
At least I hope that's all this is...
|
TxSteve
stranger
Reged: 12/01/03
Posts: 17
|
|
i did recently have to sign a long contract detailing that i would affiliate EXCLUSIVELY for empire (what i did anyway).
Since they were having me sign contracts and fax them somewhere...it is my belief that Empire will continue to support affiliates for at least a while longer.
|
Wyers
stranger
Reged: 07/29/04
Posts: 20
|
|
Quote:
i did recently have to sign a long contract detailing that i would affiliate EXCLUSIVELY for empire (what i did anyway).
Since they were having me sign contracts and fax them somewhere...it is my belief that Empire will continue to support affiliates for at least a while longer.
That's good to know as my "home base" is Empire. I extend my business to the other sites when a decent bonus opportunity rears it's head, however as far as rakeback goes... Empire is it for me.
|
Richter
stranger
Reged: 07/06/04
Posts: 1
|
|
Quote:
That's good to know as my "home base" is Empire. I extend my business to the other sites when a decent bonus opportunity rears it's head, however as far as rakeback goes... Empire is it for me.
Same here. This is what I got from my affiliate.
I read a # of posts by party poker people that said "This only applies to Party poker"
it looks like status quo for Empire at least for the moment.
http://www.casinoaffiliateprograms.com/bb/showthread.php?t=5798
Edited by Richter (04/27/05 02:38 PM)
|
kenberman
stranger
Reged: 12/24/03
Posts: 1
|
|
Quote:
i did recently have to sign a long contract detailing that i would affiliate EXCLUSIVELY for empire (what i did anyway).
Since they were having me sign contracts and fax them somewhere...it is my belief that Empire will continue to support affiliates for at least a while longer.
Party holds the cards in this game. Don't be surprised when your rakeback with Empire ends soon. Party is dead set against it.
|
otctrader
stranger
Reged: 08/29/03
Posts: 4
|
|
If Party is dead set on eliminating rakeback at the skins because it cannabilizes their business, it seems rational from their standpoint.
But I don't understand the double standard on their own (Party proper) affiliates; they're killing individual trackers, yet seem to remain chummy with certain "gift certificate" rake back operators that publicly advertise with impunity?
Can anyone shed light on this? FWIW I'm not anti-rakeback nor do I have anything against the gift certificate programs; I'm just curious what will happen going forward.
|
lehighguy
addict
Reged: 11/29/04
Posts: 590
|
|
Party wants people back at party. If they offered a good rakeback program it would be a lot simpler but they don't.
|
Smackdab
enthusiast
Reged: 10/23/02
Posts: 342
Loc: Illinois
|
|
Quote:
yet seem to remain chummy with certain "gift certificate" rake back operators that publicly advertise with impunity?
INCORRECT. Here is a portion of the email I recieved from RakeReturns which you will note asked for and received Party's permission to use gift certificates as an incentive.
As you may be aware, on Friday, Party decided to take all rakeback affiliates' trackers, and disable them. This means that while we will still be paid for your play, we can no longer track exactly who has contributed what. We are of course taking this up with Party, as we: 1) Pay by gift certificates, not cash 2) Have permission from Party to do the above 3) Bring in many "regular" players through BonusWhores.com However, it is possible they will not honor their agreement with us. It is due to this tumultuous situation that RakeReturns.com is officially ending the rakeback program at Party Poker, effective today, April 25th.
|
PokerBob
enthusiast
Reged: 03/24/04
Posts: 238
Loc: St. Paul
|
|
As of right now there is nothing to worry about and we don’t see rakeback ending anytime soon. In fact, our site is expanding. You really have to take what a lot of posters say with a grain of salt.
|
berya
newbie
Reged: 10/25/02
Posts: 41
Loc: NY
|
|
"Party holds the cards in this game. Don't be surprised when your rakeback with Empire ends soon. Party is dead set against it."
I always thought Party got some percentage if you played on sister sites. Sister sites means partnership to me. And partnership means they must be splitting money one way or the other.
All I know if not for the rakeback I would pretty much never play there. That means between them and sister sites they would be loosing 7-10K a month. Not a smart move if you ask me.
|
StacysMom
enthusiast
Reged: 09/28/04
Posts: 214
Loc: THX BARN!
|
|
Quote:
I just got this email from my PokerNow affiliate. Can anyone substantiate the part about affiliates not being able to track INDIVIDUAL rake stats.
Substantiated, it happend to me.
|
solucky
journeyman
Reged: 07/31/04
Posts: 50
|
|
Amazing Party. I pay around 600$ rake monthly and my winnings are 200$ included rakeback (without bonus). You could be sure that i dont play 60-100 hours for 50$, the only way to hold me in the pokerworld is than a excellent loyalty system.........and i dont mean this partypoints
|
teddyFBI
journeyman
Reged: 06/24/04
Posts: 99
|
|
Well hopefully all this paranoia is just over an end to individual TRACKING, and not an end to rakeback...all it means is that we'll have to go back to the 'old days' of going by pokertracker data...i don't see party actually absorbing entire skins like Empire or Eurobet, who have MUCH larger player bases than PokerNOW.
|
kenberman
stranger
Reged: 12/24/03
Posts: 1
|
|
Quote:
"Party holds the cards in this game. Don't be surprised when your rakeback with Empire ends soon. Party is dead set against it."
I always thought Party got some percentage if you played on sister sites. Sister sites means partnership to me. And partnership means they must be splitting money one way or the other.
of course Party gets revenue from Empire, and they have a partnership. But who do you think runs that relationship? Empire needs Party far more than Party needs Empire, so Party can certainly impose their will on issues they deem important. They've deemed rakeback something that they are dead against, and will work to get rid of it.
It doesn't make me happy, it's just the way it is.
Quote:
All I know if not for the rakeback I would pretty much never play there. That means between them and sister sites they would be loosing 7-10K a month
I think they're ready to see if you're serious or not.
Edited by kenberman (04/27/05 04:14 PM)
|
Chiron
enthusiast
Reged: 04/15/05
Posts: 213
Loc: the desert
|
|
I'm not entirely sure I understand Party's reasoning for shunning rakeback... Wouldn't Party make CONSIDERABLY MORE $$$ if they just offered their own rakeback deal to attract back these high volume players that are FORCED to get rakeback deals with affiliates due to opportunity cost? Party isn't going to attract these players back to their site by acting the Grinch; they are going to find a completely different network that does support rakeback instead. Can somebody explain the financial reasons behind Party's anti-rakeback crusade?
|
LuvDemNutz
stranger
Reged: 06/18/04
Posts: 13
|
|
Quote:
Well hopefully all this paranoia is just over an end to individual TRACKING, and not an end to rakeback...all it means is that we'll have to go back to the 'old days' of going by pokertracker data...i don't see party actually absorbing entire skins like Empire or Eurobet, who have MUCH larger player bases than PokerNOW.
Can you explain what you mean by going back to the "old days" of PokerTracker data? How does an affiliate have access to your PT data - or how can an affiliate trust your PT data?
I don't get it.
|
David
addict
Reged: 09/04/02
Posts: 443
Loc: Texas
|
|
Quote:
Amazing Party. I pay around 600$ rake monthly and my winnings are 200$ included rakeback (without bonus). You could be sure that i dont play 60-100 hours for 50$, the only way to hold me in the pokerworld is than a excellent loyalty system.........and i dont mean this partypoints
Not to pick on any specific poster, but, $50 per 100 hours? Jeez, get a new hobby. From alot of the posts in many threads concerning this subject I believe if alot of posters would concentrate less on rakeback and more on getting better at the game they might actually make more money. I am sensing a whole culture of people who play for rakeback and it just happens to be poker they are playing.
Edit to say; Really not picking on you solucky, I do however believe your statement is typical of many of the people who post in these threads. Instead of improving at poker they simply rely on rakeback to keep them even or make a tiny amount of money per month. These posters are missing the boat. While rakeback can't hurt there is MUCH more to be made IMO by improving your game if you are a "typical" player.
Edited by David (04/27/05 04:30 PM)
|
sonny black
newbie
Reged: 08/13/04
Posts: 27
Loc: las vegas
|
|
april 27th 4:33 Et 49008 players on 6559 tables. They don't care about any affiliates or rakeback.
|
teddyFBI
journeyman
Reged: 06/24/04
Posts: 99
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Well hopefully all this paranoia is just over an end to individual TRACKING, and not an end to rakeback...all it means is that we'll have to go back to the 'old days' of going by pokertracker data...i don't see party actually absorbing entire skins like Empire or Eurobet, who have MUCH larger player bases than PokerNOW.
Can you explain what you mean by going back to the "old days" of PokerTracker data? How does an affiliate have access to your PT data - or how can an affiliate trust your PT data?
I don't get it.
That's the whole point -- you better pick an affil u trust, b/c he won't be able to track ur play individually...so in the "old days", I'd send my affil a screenshot of my PT window...it hinges far more on the 'honor system'...why would he trust it? Well, he'd know something were fishy if his players were asking to be paid out more than he got paid from the site in commission.
|
goodguy_1
old hand
Reged: 09/17/02
Posts: 1028
|
|
here's another interesting post:IGM Speaks
Seems to me that in preparation for their IPO Party is really cleaning up its act.Getting rid of individual trackers for those players that utilize rakeback thru a Party affiliate will not solve anything for Party if all these rakeback players migrate to skins that still offer rakeback.
Are we to assume Party is going to radically change its relationship with these skins that enable rakeback ie Empire and EuroBet?Can Party risk cutting these skins off?How could Party actually find out which players are getting rakeback on these skins without the cooperation of said skin?Are the skins and Party going to go head-to head legally over this?Can Party afford to let the heavy volume players(an increasing % of total player pool) be incrementally less profitable as more serious players avoid Party and only play thru skins that offer rakeback?
Party is attempting to stem the tide of their making less on each new player or even worse the same player added to the Party Network.Right now by putting on a face that they are protecting the growth of their business model the IPO is more marketable.Fact is the IPO will probably float at the top of Party's popularity unless Party can find a way to legitimatly contnue to grow.Party's growth is being stunted by this leakage of players utilizing rakeback at other skins.
The games will continue to get tougher with a higher % of regular players multi-tabling and playing for rakeback.With a pool of ever increasing educated young players more will multi-table and more will demand rakeback.Party's growth isnt what it appears just in the player#'s -they are very deceptive.Party's best days of growth are behind it.Now they are just trying to clear up house enough to float the IPO get rich and clean the books up enough so they arent legally culpable when everyone figures out that the growth story is not what it appears.10%-20% long-term growth yes maybe 30-50% no.
Party needs to continue to get new fresh players who are no know nothing about rakeback.Can they eliminate rakeback without jeopardizing their biz model or revenue projections?doubtful..that why they are doing this bit by bit.
Right now it looks like Party is just cleaning up its own house and the next target may be all skins once they get a feel for this latest move.
As someone who has just in the last half-year finally gotten rakeback I'm not thrilled to lose 20% but I'm ready for the worst.
Edited by goodguy_1 (04/27/05 05:53 PM)
|
goodguy_1
old hand
Reged: 09/17/02
Posts: 1028
|
|
Quote:
I'm not thrilled to lose 20%
should read I'm not ready to lose 20% of my income -too late to edit -thats what happens to us crappy writers
Edited by goodguy_1 (04/27/05 05:59 PM)
|
_And1_
member
Reged: 11/20/03
Posts: 168
Loc: Sweden
|
|
Nice post goodguy.
Quote:
Are the skins and Party going to go head-to head legally over this?Can Party afford to let the heavy volume players(an increasing % of total player pool) be incrementally less profitable as more serious players avoid Party and only play thru skins that offer rakeback?
Thou cleaning the house, getting rid of all the rakebackers and many of the multitable pros will actually improve their groth and nothing else as the ppl you mentin will shun the site and the % players per flop will increase, and as it do the growth will continue. Being a loose site is far better for action and numbers than having a somewhat decent promotion system (pls remember, most players doesnt understand a good promotion when it hits them in the head (nor rake))...
|
berya
newbie
Reged: 10/25/02
Posts: 41
Loc: NY
|
|
If Pokerstars had rake back I probably would not know what a party poker table looked liked.
|
TheMetetron
journeyman
Reged: 10/01/04
Posts: 92
|
|
Hmm, this all seems like a bunch of paranoia... or maybe I'm just not ready to accept that rakeback is going to go out the window. It would certainly suck, but it wouldn't cripple me financially. It's always nice to get a few extra thousand per month
|
wateronrock
stranger
Reged: 03/17/04
Posts: 4
|
|
I could puke reading all the affiliates ass kissing the iGlobalMedia rep after Party's new stance on rakeback.
Lets see, who deserves to be compensated, the player who plays 60 000 hands a month or an affiliate who gets someone to signup with their code?
|
wateronrock
stranger
Reged: 03/17/04
Posts: 4
|
|
Party should be worried that the large affiliates, who offer rakeback, will have the abillity to deliver large numbers of players to any site that offers a good incentive.
This could be great for players, almost like a union. Party takes away our rakeback, our affiliate brokers a deal with another site and brings 1500 players. The market is too competitive to upset a large, key, group of players.
Be carefull what you wish fo Party.
|
obsidian
enthusiast
Reged: 03/12/05
Posts: 343
Loc: IL
|
|
Quote:
I could puke reading all the affiliates ass kissing the iGlobalMedia rep after Party's new stance on rakeback.
Lets see, who deserves to be compensated, the player who plays 60 000 hands a month or an affiliate who gets someone to signup with their code?
Agreed. Good thing they don't let new accounts post there or the 2+2 guys would horde them (well at least I can't).
Edited by obsidian (04/27/05 08:44 PM)
|
SlantNGo
member
Reged: 06/08/04
Posts: 133
|
|
Why can't you just send him all your HHs from your hard drive at the end of every week or something, then your affiliate can import them into his PT database and determine how much rake you have paid?
Quote:
That's the whole point -- you better pick an affil u trust, b/c he won't be able to track ur play individually...so in the "old days", I'd send my affil a screenshot of my PT window...it hinges far more on the 'honor system'...why would he trust it? Well, he'd know something were fishy if his players were asking to be paid out more than he got paid from the site in commission.
|
moondogg
member
Reged: 10/29/03
Posts: 145
|
|
Quote:
Why can't you just send him all your HHs from your hard drive at the end of every week or something, then your affiliate can import them into his PT database and determine how much rake you have paid?
Quote:
That's the whole point -- you better pick an affil u trust, b/c he won't be able to track ur play individually...so in the "old days", I'd send my affil a screenshot of my PT window...it hinges far more on the 'honor system'...why would he trust it? Well, he'd know something were fishy if his players were asking to be paid out more than he got paid from the site in commission.
Because this is too easily doctored. I could easily take a bunch of my Empire hand histories and just change them to look like Party hand histories (using a global find-and-replace through UltraEdit or similar tools). Also, I could easily make a PokerTracker screenshot that includes hands played at a different site.
You must also account for bonuses, which the player may neglect to mention.
As was stated, it's easy to tell if some of your players are lying to you, because the numbers don't add up. However, you don't necessarily know which ones are lying, and you don't really have any way to resolve such disputes.
You may be able to do it with a select few players whom you know and trust, but it's just not practical for a large affiliates.
At least that's my understanding.
|
teddyFBI
journeyman
Reged: 06/24/04
Posts: 99
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Why can't you just send him all your HHs from your hard drive at the end of every week or something, then your affiliate can import them into his PT database and determine how much rake you have paid?
Quote:
That's the whole point -- you better pick an affil u trust, b/c he won't be able to track ur play individually...so in the "old days", I'd send my affil a screenshot of my PT window...it hinges far more on the 'honor system'...why would he trust it? Well, he'd know something were fishy if his players were asking to be paid out more than he got paid from the site in commission.
Because this is too easily doctored. I could easily take a bunch of my Empire hand histories and just change them to look like Party hand histories (using a global find-and-replace through UltraEdit or similar tools). Also, I could easily make a PokerTracker screenshot that includes hands played at a different site.
You must also account for bonuses, which the player may neglect to mention.
As was stated, it's easy to tell if some of your players are lying to you, because the numbers don't add up. However, you don't necessarily know which ones are lying, and you don't really have any way to resolve such disputes.
You may be able to do it with a select few players whom you know and trust, but it's just not practical for a large affiliates.
At least that's my understanding.
Yep, pretty much what he said. That's how things essentially worked in the pre-mega-affiliate-rakeback sites though...so trust is a 2-way street between affiliate and player -- if i were forced to go back to that, i'd prob only work with 20 or so people who i knew and trusted to some extent.
|
StellarWind
old hand
Reged: 02/02/04
Posts: 704
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Why can't you just send him all your HHs from your hard drive at the end of every week or something, then your affiliate can import them into his PT database and determine how much rake you have paid?
Because this is too easily doctored. I could easily take a bunch of my Empire hand histories and just change them to look like Party hand histories (using a global find-and-replace through UltraEdit or similar tools).
The affiliate can easily randomly spot check the submitted hand histories by using the hand numbers to request copies of the HHs from Party. Compare the two hand histories to ensure that they match. Even if you only checked a handful of histories you would quickly catch any significant fraud.
There is an opportunity here for someone to write software tools that:
1. Reads hand histories from a player's hard drive and computes rake share on a hand-by-hand basis. The output file is a list of hand numbers and MGR amounts.
The player mails this report to the affiliate, where another tool:
2. Verifies the report by randomly requesting HHs from Party and comparing them to the numbers in the report.
|
busguy
enthusiast
Reged: 06/09/04
Posts: 274
Loc: Vancouver, Canada
|
|
Quote:
Party takes away our rakeback, our affiliate brokers a deal with another site and brings 1500 players.
Wow and wouldn't that just be a great place to play . . . .
Anyone who thinks like this please fell free to give your collective heads a shake if you think anybody is going to stop playing at Party (or skins) even without rakeback.
busguy
|
Rick Nebiolo
old hand
Reged: 09/02/02
Posts: 1179
Loc: Los Angeles
|
|
Quote:
I'm not entirely sure I understand Party's reasoning for shunning rakeback... Wouldn't Party make CONSIDERABLY MORE $$$ if they just offered their own rakeback deal to attract back these high volume players that are FORCED to get rakeback deals with affiliates due to opportunity cost? Party isn't going to attract these players back to their site by acting the Grinch; they are going to find a completely different network that does support rakeback instead. Can somebody explain the financial reasons behind Party's anti-rakeback crusade?
The players who tend to be savvy enough to get rakeback, mine data (facilitated by Party and skins dumping data directly to your hard drive), mult-table and so on tend to be the tougher players. Losing them would mean a short term hit for Party's bottom line but the games would get softer for those who don't mine data and multi-table and this would fuel future growth. This assmes that Party gets Empire and Coral/Eurobet to follow suit, which I assume is within their power.
~ Rick
|
Rick Nebiolo
old hand
Reged: 09/02/02
Posts: 1179
Loc: Los Angeles
|
|
Thoughtful analysis. Thanks for the link, interesting stuff.
~ Rick
|
Maulik
old hand
Reged: 01/10/05
Posts: 892
Loc: 30 + rake
|
|
does this mean i shouldn't bother opening new accounts with partypoker when I move to a new apartment with rakeback?
|
busguy
enthusiast
Reged: 06/09/04
Posts: 274
Loc: Vancouver, Canada
|
|
Quote:
when I move to a new apartment with rakeback?
man they have these now ?? I wouldn't have bought a house had I known that !!
busguy
|
grimel
old hand
Reged: 03/19/05
Posts: 1017
Loc: south east USA
|
|
It's already loose. It's been loose. It'll stay loose.
|
goodguy_1
old hand
Reged: 09/17/02
Posts: 1028
|
|
Quote:
Anyone who thinks like this please fell free to give your collective heads a shake if you think anybody is going to stop playing at Party (or skins) even without rakeback.
busguy
I agree with this.I will still be playing at Party as long as it is the preferred site for fish even if rakeback is barred across the Party Network.Actually it would most likely force me to work on my game which would be a good thing.I would most definetly move up another level as well.
I also think if rakeback is halted that the quality of the games will most likely improve over time as many multi-tablings rocks who are now small marginal winners but really get helped the most from the rakeback susidies just give up.This could be wishful thinking thu.The games in general are still the best anywhere online so with or without rakeback I'll still be playing Party.
Another thing that could happen is that with Party more clearly protecting their affiliates ie affiliates no longer having to compete with affiliates who offer rakeback ..it is possible you could see an even harder push to market the site by new affiliates.That could possibly also make the games better which would take a little bit of the sting off losing rakeback as well..again maybe that is just wishfull thinking.Just seems to me IF Party can reinvigorate its affiliate program to its initial objective-getting new players..it would be good for Party and regular players.
Edited by goodguy_1 (04/28/05 02:50 AM)
|
Skipbidder
addict
Reged: 02/14/05
Posts: 415
Loc: Illinois
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
when I move to a new apartment with rakeback?
man they have these now ?? I wouldn't have bought a house had I known that !!
busguy
You bought a house without rakeback? Sucker. You should sell the house and buy a new one in six months.
|
SinCityGuy
enthusiast
Reged: 09/23/03
Posts: 362
Loc: Las Vegas
|
|
Quote:
Just seems to me IF Party can reinvigorate its affiliate program to its initial objective-getting new players..it would be good for Party and regular players.
I don't know what the ultimate outcome will be, but it seems grossly unfair for a player to play 40,000 hands per month, generate a ton of rake, and get no compensation for it; while his affiliate gets rich for doing nothing more than taking 5 minutes to sign him up under his code.
I have a feeling that this might end up helping some of the larger non-Party skins like UB, who openly welcome players getting rakeback. This might be their chance to start closing the gap.
|
Maulik
old hand
Reged: 01/10/05
Posts: 892
Loc: 30 + rake
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
when I move to a new apartment with rakeback?
man they have these now ?? I wouldn't have bought a house had I known that !!
busguy
eek, me speak engrish ...
of course they have apartments with rakeback!
I have accts with 5 partypoker skins, none with rakeback. should i open new accounts with partypoker using my new address to earn rakeback?
|
daveymck
enthusiast
Reged: 11/06/03
Posts: 388
|
|
I think at the end of the day the IPO has a lot to do with it but also I suspect all the recent spate of super affiliate rakeback sites that have opened up and are openly offering rakeback (even if only on the skins) have caused party to take action.
I also suspect that pressure will come onto the other skins to stop the practice as well, as they seem to have the software they can put pressure on Empire/Coral etc and contract dependant could even threaten to cut off the skins which would leave them with the option of trying to get on another network or bow to Party's will.
Be interesting to see how this pans out, but I dont see it affecting the numbers we see on Party each night, even if there is 1500-2000 rakebackers jumping ship (hell even if it is 10,000 overall) thats a small percentage of their player base.
|
Chiron
enthusiast
Reged: 04/15/05
Posts: 213
Loc: the desert
|
|
A small percentage, yes, but those are also going to be some of the highest volume players, so naturally they will count for more than just a few percent taking MGR into account.
|
Freudian
stranger
Reged: 02/11/04
Posts: 24
|
|
I think rakeback is very important for volume. It allows players to constantly increase the number of tables (and the loss in BB/100 hands it brings) with a buffer.
|
sublime
addict
Reged: 03/12/04
Posts: 681
Loc: Boston
|
|
I have accts with 5 partypoker skins, none with rakeback
you should sign up and get rakeback
|
Daliman
enthusiast
Reged: 09/03/02
Posts: 382
|
|
Quote:
april 27th 4:33 Et 49008 players on 6559 tables. They don't care about any affiliates or rakeback.
All of these are not necessarily Party players.
|
pipster
journeyman
Reged: 01/31/05
Posts: 77
|
|
Doesn't Party allow Rakeback in the form of Party certificates? That you can deposit directly to your party account and cash out? Is it really THAT different to get direct rakeback and party "dollars"? Or did Party do away with their certificate program thing they were allowing?
|
Daliman
enthusiast
Reged: 09/03/02
Posts: 382
|
|
This whole thing is among the stupider things I have EVER heard of a company doing.
Let's see, Party gives out 1-2 bonus codes per month to get people to reload their accounts and play more.
If these same people got rakeback, they'd be able to play more/longer on their $$$. Also, if they lost $500 or so, they wouldn;t feel so bad borrowing $$$ from a friend to play more if they knew they had $300 coming back at the end of the month.
Not to mention the fact that if affiliates keep all the $$$, in most cases, that is $$$, taken out of the poker economy, specifically, Party's economy.
This is the early stages of Party scaling back what they pay affiliates, if not cancelling them outright in time,(which I doubt). My thought is they will go to a flat pay for all referrals, that's all.
I'm sure that IGM's thought process is; "the only people who get alot of rakeback are pros. We don't need pros. If people know they have $$$ coming back at the end of the month, they won't deposit more, and our $$$ base will collapse upon itself."
All of which, of course, is utter nonsense.
It has been stated elsewhere that affiliates will just take their business and customers to anhter party skin where they will not get a hassle. This is already happening, and as for my own personal play, they can say goodbye to 8k a month minimum, and many of my friends.
The smartest thing party could ever do would be to offer direct rakeback into player's PP accounts WITHOUT the affiliates on a monthly, escalating scale basis. Don;t count on it happening
Edited by Daliman (04/28/05 10:10 AM)
|
Rick Nebiolo
old hand
Reged: 09/02/02
Posts: 1179
Loc: Los Angeles
|
|
Quote:
It's already loose. It's been loose. It'll stay loose.
It's not loose compared to typical B&M (especially at lower limits) and games can toughen up for all sorts of reasons. Making it too easy for multi-tabler data miners (who usually play tighter) is not in Party's interest IN THE LONG RUN (keeping these players for an IPO is a special situation).
~ Rick
|
Moyer
member
Reged: 09/20/03
Posts: 150
Loc: Iowa
|
|
Quote:
The smartest thing party could ever do would be to offer direct rakeback into player's PP accounts WITHOUT the affiliates on a monthly, escalating scale basis. Don;t count on it happening
Then wouldn't all of their affiliates quit?
|
Misfire
enthusiast
Reged: 03/20/05
Posts: 234
Loc: Sweating my small-sample ROI
|
|
Here's what I don't understand. Party & skins are already paying their affiliates $x out of the rake. The affiliates could do two things with that money.
A) They could pocket the money and go on with their lives and Party/skins never see the money again, or
B) They could pay the players a % in rakeback, which the players will most likely deposit back into their Party/skin accounts to generate EVEN MORE RAKE.
Why on earth would they want to stop this??
|
busguy
enthusiast
Reged: 06/09/04
Posts: 274
Loc: Vancouver, Canada
|
|
Quote:
B) They could pay the players a % in rakeback, which the players will most likely deposit back into their Party/skin accounts to generate EVEN MORE RAKE.
This is very likely not the case. Do you not see why ??
busguy
|
Misfire
enthusiast
Reged: 03/20/05
Posts: 234
Loc: Sweating my small-sample ROI
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
B) They could pay the players a % in rakeback, which the players will most likely deposit back into their Party/skin accounts to generate EVEN MORE RAKE.
This is very likely not the case. Do you not see why ??
Perhaps I'm thinking as a player still building his roll. I guess the bigger rakers are already comfortable and are using the money for other things.
But even if players most likely wouldn't redeposit, I don't see how Party is worse off than if the affiliate had just kept the $$. Am I missing something else?
|
Bremen
member
Reged: 08/31/04
Posts: 178
|
|
Quote:
I don't see how Party is worse off than if the affiliate had just kept the $$. Am I missing something else?
It creates a disincentive for legitimate affiliates to sign up new players. If there is no rakebake players keep playing on their orginal account, which may have been signed up through an affiliate link. If this happens affiliates have a much larger incentive to sign up new players. Which means more players for party which means more rake...
|
gumpzilla
veteran
Reged: 02/11/05
Posts: 1401
|
|
Quote:
This is already happening, and as for my own personal play, they can say goodbye to 8k a month minimum, and many of my friends.
But I thought you already did that? Link.
|
Misfire
enthusiast
Reged: 03/20/05
Posts: 234
Loc: Sweating my small-sample ROI
|
|
Quote:
It creates a disincentive for legitimate affiliates to sign up new players. If there is no rakebake players keep playing on their orginal account, which may have been signed up through an affiliate link. If this happens affiliates have a much larger incentive to sign up new players. Which means more players for party which means more rake...
I think that's based on the assumption that rakeback affilliates are illegitimate. Not trying to argue, just trying to make sure I understand it all. By allowing rakeback, wouldn't that create an incentive for the rakeback affiliates to sign up all those same players the non-rakeback affiliates would have signed up? And couldn't the attraction of a generous rakeback attract even more players to party/skins in the first place?
If the goal of party is the maximize their number of players, I don't see offering rakeback would attract fewer players than not offering it.
|
jon_1van
journeyman
Reged: 10/08/02
Posts: 53
Loc: Silver Spring MD
|
|
Very good thinking
|
busguy
enthusiast
Reged: 06/09/04
Posts: 274
Loc: Vancouver, Canada
|
|
I'm not sure why this concept still seems so foreign to people.
1) Party does not offer rakeback. 2) Party's affiliate program has brought in a lot of players. 2) Party has been losing knowledgeble players to their skins because of rake-back. 4) Party starts to shut down their skins ability to offer rakeback (shut down Poker Now, limit the 3 of trackers per affiliate etc)
Party probably wouldn't have cared about their skins offering rake-back if they had of been able to limit it to new players. But with the number of existing Party players opening accounts at the skins to get rakeback it MUST be hurting their bottom line.
Additionally, Party would be stupid to get into the rakeback game because it would be self defeating. To get the players back they would have to offer a rake-back greater than that which was offered by the Skins. The skins would then up the rate they offer to fight off an exodus back to Party, which would lead party to . . . .
From a purely business point of view, there really are very few options other than the one that they apear to be taking.
busguy
|
flair1239
enthusiast
Reged: 07/12/04
Posts: 343
|
|
Party's problem is this. It makes no sense to give eryone "rakeback" why not just lower the rake?
The purpose of rakeback is primarily to attract/reward high volume players. As long as it was kind of an underground little sub-culture thing among hardcore players, there was really no problem. But now everybody, even some casual players are aware that it exists. I don't blame Party for not wanting the system anymore.
But the soloution is pretty simple. Account specific bonus codes. They do it now to a certain extent. When I logged on to do this latest bonus, I was suprised to see that I had been given $50 and a additional $100 comeback bonus.
What Party could do is just give these bonus codes to their high volume players. That way they are not leaking money on say a casual player who does maybe 1000 hands a week. But they are still providing incentive to the high volume guys.
|
BusterStacks
stranger
Reged: 04/19/04
Posts: 7
|
|
Party is run by monkeys and you guys are all acting like the sky is falling. Relax.
Seriously.
|
Misfire
enthusiast
Reged: 03/20/05
Posts: 234
Loc: Sweating my small-sample ROI
|
|
Quote:
2) Party has been losing knowledgeble players to their skins because of rake-back.
Isn't this better than losing them to a non-party-skin pokerroom that will still offer rakeback when the skins stop offering it?
|
bmetz
stranger
Reged: 08/11/04
Posts: 13
|
|
Quote:
Party is run by monkeys and you guys are all acting like the sky is falling. Relax.
Seriously.
But the sky is falling.
|
otctrader
stranger
Reged: 08/29/03
Posts: 4
|
|
That's a pretty ominous post - any of our affy's have a clue what IGM's scheme is?
|
busguy
enthusiast
Reged: 06/09/04
Posts: 274
Loc: Vancouver, Canada
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
2) Party has been losing knowledgeble players to their skins because of rake-back.
Isn't this better than losing them to a non-party-skin pokerroom that will still offer rakeback when the skins stop offering it?
Sure, but it was my contention (see post above) that very few people would leave Party and play elsewhere "just" for rake-rack. The difference between Party (and skins) and any other site for cash ring games is HUGE when looking at the number of fish, the looseness of the tables and the most important one for multi-tablers . . . . table selection.
I'm only speaking from personal experience with this, but I gave up bonus whoring at other Poker sites along time ago realizing that playing at Party without a bonus and or rake back was still MUCH more profitable on a daily basis than playing any where else that may be offering either( or both).
busguy
|
flair1239
enthusiast
Reged: 07/12/04
Posts: 343
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
2) Party has been losing knowledgeble players to their skins because of rake-back.
Isn't this better than losing them to a non-party-skin pokerroom that will still offer rakeback when the skins stop offering it?
Sure, but it was my contention (see post above) that very few people would leave Party and play elsewhere "just" for rake-rack. The difference between Party (and skins) and any other site for cash ring games is HUGE when looking at the number of fish, the looseness of the tables and the most important one for multi-tablers . . . . table selection.
I'm only speaking from personal experience with this, but I gave up bonus whoring at other Poker sites along time ago realizing that playing at Party without a bonus and or rake back was still MUCH more profitable on a daily basis than playing any where else that may be offering either( or both).
busguy
While it is true that Party offers the best game selection of any one site; I believe it is overrated in this respect. Not that the games are not soft, but you can find the smae type of games and better by being willing to play multiple sites.
I could never play Party again and find good games just fine. But Party is very convienent. But to say it is irreplaceable is not true.
|
SinCityGuy
enthusiast
Reged: 09/23/03
Posts: 362
Loc: Las Vegas
|
|
Quote:
I'm not sure why this concept still seems so foreign to people.
1) Party does not offer rakeback.
Yes they do. They give it all back to the affiliate. That's what's so ridiculous about this whole crusade. They give it all back to the affiliate for doing nothing more than spending 5 minutes to sign up a player, while the player is getting nothing in return for his 40K hands per month.
|
Rick Nebiolo
old hand
Reged: 09/02/02
Posts: 1179
Loc: Los Angeles
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
2) Party has been losing knowledgeble players to their skins because of rake-back.
Isn't this better than losing them to a non-party-skin pokerroom that will still offer rakeback when the skins stop offering it?
If Party loses tough, knowledgable players to their skins then that is bad for Party (since the skins share the same tables as Party - jackpot and promo tables excepted). If Party loses tough, knowlegable players to other sites then IN THE LONG TERM it is good for Party and their skins and bad for the other sites (except for sites that don't have a critical mass of games).
Party has the fishiest games (of the major sites) because of relatively great marketing and DESPITE the services (e.g., letting Pokertracker users dump data automatically to thier hard drive) that make it easy for top players to multi-table at a profit. As the tough players multiply and fish get eaten up too quickly, all this could change and Party games could go downhill fast.
A key for any new or existing online room is attracting and keeping a base of fishy players. If there are fish, you will attrack some sharks, but that doesn't mean you have to spoon feed the sharks.
~ Rick
|
bmetz
stranger
Reged: 08/11/04
Posts: 13
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not sure why this concept still seems so foreign to people.
1) Party does not offer rakeback.
Yes they do. They give it all back to the affiliate. That's what's so ridiculous about this whole crusade. They give it all back to the affiliate for doing nothing more than spending 5 minutes to sign up a player, while the player is getting nothing in return for his 40K hands per month.
Advertising 101
Party pays affiliates to bring them players.
In return for the affiliate bringing Party players, Party pays said affiliate in one of two ways:
1. Cost Per Acquisition (CPA) - $65-75 per player 2. Revenue Sharing - 20-25% of MGR generated by referred player. This option is left up to the affiliate.
I guess the original poster should have clarified a bit for you...
Party does not offer rakeback to their players.
|
SinCityGuy
enthusiast
Reged: 09/23/03
Posts: 362
Loc: Las Vegas
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not sure why this concept still seems so foreign to people.
1) Party does not offer rakeback.
Yes they do. They give it all back to the affiliate. That's what's so ridiculous about this whole crusade. They give it all back to the affiliate for doing nothing more than spending 5 minutes to sign up a player, while the player is getting nothing in return for his 40K hands per month.
Advertising 101
Party pays affiliates to bring them players.
In return for the affiliate bringing Party players, Party pays said affiliate in one of two ways:
1. Cost Per Acquisition (CPA) - $65-75 per player 2. Revenue Sharing - 20-25% of MGR generated by referred player. This option is left up to the affiliate.
I guess the original poster should have clarified a bit for you...
Party does not offer rakeback to their players.
Yes, I'm well aware of this. As I said, the affiliate spends 5 minutes signing a guy up, and then is rewarded with rakeback for the player's hard work for the rest of his playing career, which is stupid.
The ultimate solution is to give the affiliate a flat fee for signing up the new player. After that, he gets nothing. The rakeback could be redirected to the player on an incentive program. If he plays few hands, he gets a very small percentage. They more hands he plays, the higher percentage he gets back (capped at 25% or whatever). This alone would give all players the incentive to play more, thus generating more profit for the site.
|
busguy
enthusiast
Reged: 06/09/04
Posts: 274
Loc: Vancouver, Canada
|
|
Quote:
Yes, I'm well aware of this.
Yah . . . you just thought you be an ass by pointing out the obvious.
Quote:
As I said, the affiliate spends 5 minutes signing a guy up, and then is rewarded with rakeback for the player's hard work for the rest of his playing career, which is stupid.
Yah it would be way better if Party kept it all wouldn't it ?? . . . .
Quote:
The ultimate solution is to give the affiliate a flat fee for signing up the new player. After that, he gets nothing. The rakeback could be redirected to the player on an incentive program. If he plays few hands, he gets a very small percentage. They more hands he plays, the higher percentage he gets back (capped at 25% or whatever). This alone would give all players the incentive to play more, thus generating more profit for the site.
Do you seriously not understand why this will not happen in the foreseable future ?? Party's hands are tied in that (although a good idea) it would be very hard to implement and probably very ineffective at getting the players back that it has already lost. Because something like that was not implemented from the start, Party probably wouldn't (even if it wanted to) make something like that work now that the rampant rake-back stuff is occuring at the skins.
Quit whining about how stupid it is and realize that Party is likely doing by far the most effective (and logical) solution to this (party's) problem . . . and is VERY unlikely to alter it's position.
I do totally agree with you though that it would be great if we could get Party to realize the value of the high volume player and then get them to do something to look after us more.
busguy
Edited by busguy (04/28/05 05:53 PM)
|
ThaSaltCracka
old hand
Reged: 09/10/03
Posts: 983
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
|
so...this seems silly, they are only going to give money back to affiliates in lump sums. Of course the affiliates are for this plan, because they won't be able to pay those that signed up under them. Why don't all the players just create new accounts and say [censored] the affiliates?
|
Non_Comformist
member
Reged: 03/20/04
Posts: 101
|
|
Quote:
SinCityGuy
Clearly you understand your avatar kicks all of kinds of ass.
|
sfwusc
old hand
Reged: 10/11/04
Posts: 742
Loc: Moving out of the kiddie Pool
|
|
http://www.casinoaffiliateprograms.com/bb/showthread.php?t=5858
|
thwang99
addict
Reged: 09/02/02
Posts: 463
Loc: California, USA
|
|
That's the main point here, I think even without rakeback, people will STILL play at party cause that's where the fish are! Party raised their rake in the past, and yet it was still the best place to play.
I believe even if rakeback ended, AND the rake was raised yet AGAIN, party would still be the most profitable place to play.
- Tony
|
cbfair
enthusiast
Reged: 09/21/04
Posts: 206
|
|
Quote:
http://www.casinoaffiliateprograms.com/bb/showthread.php?t=5858
I've read several threads at casinoaffiliates.com today and in every one, the affiliates come off as whiny children tattling on their siblings to Momma Satya. Not only is their handling of the situation childish and silly, but the affiliates posting on that site come off as wanting to mooch off their client players and give nothing in return.
As a player, I just don't see any reason to give these leaches any cut of my play if they aren't providing a tangible service. It's just as easy to go directly to partypoker.com and download the client without using an affiliate link as it is to click through one of their portal sites. Contrary to their beliefs, many people know they are clicking through an affiliate link and give thought to who is benefitting from the deal even if they don't consider rakeback.
While I don't have a pat answer for which approach is best for Party or the affiliates, I do happen to be a happy client of the "major affiliate" that they all want to see brought down. And quite frankly, I'm offended by the whole thing. This isn't because I'm greedy and want something for nothing (I am and I do, but thats not why I care) its because I'm very satisfied with the business relationship I've established with my affliate. Everyone gets exactly what they expect, Party gets all of my non bonus-chasing play, the affiliate receives some healthy income and I get gift cards which all go to my wife and keep her satisfied with the time I spend playing.
If the leaches posting at casinoaffiliates.com have their way, they would destroy that healthy, functioning relationship and still not get my business.
In other words, because they are not creative enough to compete with a leader, the seek to cut that leader down at the knees and hurt thousands of players in the process. That is simply childish.
|
DMBFan23
addict
Reged: 06/10/04
Posts: 417
Loc: I don't want a large Farva
|
|
Quote:
so...this seems silly, they are only going to give money back to affiliates in lump sums. Of course the affiliates are for this plan, because they won't be able to pay those that signed up under them. Why don't all the players just create new accounts and say [censored] the affiliates?
I imagine many players will do this if their affiliates cannot work something out
|
Jeff W
journeyman
Reged: 05/31/04
Posts: 85
|
|
Good post. I agree wholeheartedly.
|
Soleo
newbie
Reged: 07/29/03
Posts: 47
|
|
Quote:
How does an affiliate have access to your PT data - or how can an affiliate trust your PT data?
It's not that hard and PT is not necessary here: affiliate should provide his players with executable application which will read HH-files from player's hard drive and count hands where rake has been added for this player during appropriate period. Then it should digitally sign collected summary info with its key and provide encrypted text to player to send it manually by e-mail to affiliate.
This will not guarantee that player didn't add fake hand histories to wind up his rakeback but it's not a problem: having all the data from all players affiliate will become able to find 1 screwing component from total and then fire him. However if more than 1 player makes fake data then it will be impossible to detect who specifically does.
But I think additional automated random checks at affiliate's side using some requested HHs by # will solve the problem - player will know that he has say 20% chance to be caught with fake hand histories, so highly unlikely that any abuse will take place. (Then all processed hands numbers should probably be included into summary being sent to affiliate. Some archiving may be used instead of encrypting to reduce the summary size.)
|
jrbick
member
Reged: 02/17/05
Posts: 129
|
|
This is from another post (name below) in this forum and thought I may get an answer here.
Quote: Re: how do these rakeback providers not get caught? [Re: LinusKS] #2272244 - 04/29/05 01:55 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They're under pressure from their legitimate affiliates - the ones that don't offer rakeback. An affiliate who doesn't offer rakeback can't compete against the ones that do.
Also, rakeback has created a tremendous incentive for Party players to move to other skins, or to create second accounts, so that they can get in on the action. The point of affiliates, remember, is to generate new players, not to cannabalize the existing player base. The majority of rb deals - I'd be willing to bet - go to players who already have at least one account.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER -- If I misunderstand any of the inner-workings of iGlobalMedia and it's relationship to PTY, forgive me and please correct me.
This (above quote) is exactly what makes me wonder why the the future of Empire and co. have anything to worry about -- Is it not iGlobalMedia that is truly running the show here thus rendering the precise skin of "Party Poker" as expendable? I'm not seeing how "Party Poker" is absolutely essential other than for origninality; but even then, it's not as if PP has marketed itself to the point of being irreplaceable, no?
Case in point, if Empire/Euro/etc. are generating PLENTY 'O MONEY for iGlobalMedia, what does iGlobalMedia care? Are Empire and co. accountable directly to PP?
Maybe I misunderstand the importance of PP to iGlobalMedia's marketing strength?
|
2easy
stranger
Reged: 10/23/03
Posts: 0
|
|
i think party IS basically iglobal. and vice versa.
Edited by 2easy (04/29/05 05:51 AM)
|
bmetz
stranger
Reged: 08/11/04
Posts: 13
|
|
Quote:
In other words, because they are not creative enough to compete with a leader, the seek to cut that leader down at the knees and hurt thousands of players in the process. That is simply childish.
I think one of the main reasons affiliates are complaining about that 'specific affiliate' is that while Party has implemented a system that prevents everyone other affiliate from offering rakeback to their players, they handfeed precisely the stats that they're denying the rest of their affiliates and are seemingly turning a blind eye to it.
No amount of 'creativity' can overcome that limitation. Affiliates simply cannot compete because they've been 'cut down at the knees' by Party itself.
|
The Truth
enthusiast
Reged: 12/29/04
Posts: 207
|
|
I have a few things to add.
1. We can all become affilates for party, And have ourselves signed up under us, and try to get a few other people, might as well. I think if you dont have a large group of players you'll only get like 20% rakeback or something, dunno the rules.
2. We are grossssly underestimating the amount of income we bring into party poker. It is not true that party poker would be better off without us because the games would be softer. I think it would be good if some of you people had experience with running games yourself. Like at an amvets or something. Party Poker could care less if you win or lose. They only care about how much rake you generate. That is all that matters. We play more tables, thus there are more tables full for the fish to play so there is more rake per hour to party. IT WOULD BE VERY NOT GOOD FOR PARTY IF ALL THE BIG TIME WINNING PLAYERS QUIT EVEN FOR A MONTH.
3. There is a misconception that the games at party are sooo mcuh softer than other sites. I haven't played on any sites that are tougher than party. STARS is easy, UB is easy, POKER ROOM is EASIER than party, ABSOLUTE is tighter but still easy. The good thing about party is the number of games going at once, you dont have to have 5 different sites open to find a bunch of good games. We can find the games elsewhere, its just easier this way.
|
Exsubmariner
journeyman
Reged: 10/27/04
Posts: 71
Loc: Now Declassified
|
|
Thank you for the link. I set up an account there so I could troll them. But, reading the forum, it seems they have been infested with trolls, lately. I wonder why? Looks like I will have to try the path of civil discussion.
|
otctrader
stranger
Reged: 08/29/03
Posts: 4
|
|
I'm still confused as to why that "specific affiliate" is priveleged to operate under the double standard right under Party's nose. Either:
a) They have some contractual agreement (which I assume expires at some point)
b) The affiliate is just playing stupid hoping to draw in players, then send out a "Party killed rakeback we can't pay you, blah blah" and hope to generate revenue for itself.
Anyone know? I'm not against this affiliate either, I want to know since I'm looking to "reassign" my Party account to get some of my own vig back but don't want to bother if they will stop paying out soon anyway.
|
byronkincaid
newbie
Reged: 04/29/03
Posts: 27
Loc: Carshalton, UK
|
|
When party go public and the owners are all zillionaires, is it really going to matter to them what happens to the company? I mean seriously if I build up a poker site and sell out for a few hundred million I'm gonna be like Oi supermodel, skin me up another joint and get your skinny ass over here. Not oh no stars have got more players than us now what am I going to do.
|
The Truth
enthusiast
Reged: 12/29/04
Posts: 207
|
|
Quote:
When party go public and the owners are all zillionaires, is it really going to matter to them what happens to the company? I mean seriously if I build up a poker site and sell out for a few hundred million I'm gonna be like Oi supermodel, skin me up another joint and get your skinny ass over here. Not oh no stars have got more players than us now what am I going to do.
And that is why you will never make a "few hundred million"
|
byronkincaid
newbie
Reged: 04/29/03
Posts: 27
Loc: Carshalton, UK
|
|
Ain't that the truth.
|
Timer
member
Reged: 12/16/02
Posts: 128
|
|
Quote:
When party go public and the owners are all zillionaires, is it really going to matter to them what happens to the company?
It depends on how long it takes to become vested. One year is the norm. So for a year at least they will care a lot.
|
Dazarath
member
Reged: 11/01/04
Posts: 185
|
|
In response to the posting suggesting that an affiliate use PT stats, I would like to give a similar suggestion, that is slightly tweaked. I counted somewhere ~40 15/30 tables. A little less actually, as I'm not counting the few 6-max tables and not the private ones either.
- Using 5 Party skins on two different computers, one could datamine all 40 tables at once. - Then, there are two options: 1) Write software like the poster above described that would calculate every player's MGR. 2) A simplified method (which would also be more open to cheating) would be to just come up with an average amount per hand, and pay by the number of hands played.
The problems with this suggestion: - I have no idea who'd want to run two computers 24/7. It's not worth it until you have a lot of people under you. - I just picked 15/30 because it seems to be a pretty popular limit at this site. There's no way an affiliate could expand this to include all of Party's tables. This would limit the possible customers to a single limit. - With the method of just counting hands and assuming an average rake per hand, well, there's the obvious error in the assumption, but then there's also the possibility that people could get together on an empty table and rack up their hand count.
I almost think it'd be better for people to just split off into small groups of friends and deal with it. If I had friends who insisted on having rakebake (by friends, I'm also implying trustworthy), we could all sign up under one of ourselves and just save hand history files.
|
Chiron
enthusiast
Reged: 04/15/05
Posts: 213
Loc: the desert
|
|
Quote:
I almost think it'd be better for people to just split off into small groups of friends and deal with it. If I had friends who insisted on having rakebake (by friends, I'm also implying trustworthy), we could all sign up under one of ourselves and just save hand history files.
Will somebody be my friend?
Err.. um... and if not, how easy is it to set up an affiliate account (for a small group of friends)?
|
Back In Black
stranger
Reged: 04/29/05
Posts: 23
|
|
You can't sign up under your own affiliate account at party.
|
Dazarath
member
Reged: 11/01/04
Posts: 185
|
|
You're not allowed to delete your account and sign up for a new one either, but I don't think that's going to be stopping people. There's always the option of having a friend who doesn't play on Party create an affiliate account and work from there.
|
JRussell
journeyman
Reged: 04/29/05
Posts: 62
|
|
Quote:
You're not allowed to delete your account and sign up for a new one either, but I don't think that's going to be stopping people. There's always the option of having a friend who doesn't play on Party create an affiliate account and work from there.
The problem here is that your friend's affiliate account will be frozen after not signing-up any new players for 60 days.
|
zaphod
member
Reged: 08/12/04
Posts: 122
Loc: Bergen, Norway
|
|
Quote:
The smartest thing party could ever do would be to offer direct rakeback into player's PP accounts WITHOUT the affiliates on a monthly, escalating scale basis. Don;t count on it happening
|
Billman
newbie
Reged: 11/20/03
Posts: 31
|
|
Here's what I see as the fundamental issues here:
1. Party has crappy software yet they are devoting their efforts to stamping out rakebacks instead of improving the user experience. That's gotta be the worst buddy list implementation I've ever seen. I've personally written better chat/buddy programs. It's not that damn hard. So what's the big deal? It speaks volumes about where their loyalties are. They don't care about players, affiliates, or even partner skins. It's about putting as much cash into their pocket as humanly possible while this poker craze is still hot.
2. There's no logical reason for Party to go public other than to make the owners really, really rich (instead of just rich or really rich). See #1 for more evidence of this. Online poker is a massive cash cow. It generates far more money than they can spend on expanding the existing operations, so why raise even more money?
3. For everyone who keeps claiming that Party has the best games and big players won't go elsewhere because the fish are all at Party, you must have missed that whole dotcom thing a few years back. Plenty of companies came and went very quickly. Many got very big, very fast, and went out of business just as quickly. The fish might not know how to play poker but most aren't completely brain dead either. If another site starts offering a compelling alternative they'll go there. Right now, Party is competing in a market of business retards. I played tens of thousands of hands a month on Paradise for over a year and then took my business elsewhere when they couldn't spread enough games at my limit for me to have any chance at game selection. You know how they're trying to lure me back? Every six months they send me an offer for a $50 reload bonus. $50!!! Are they completely clueless or what? Do they not see Party or UB or FullTilt offering double, triple, that amount almost monthly? Plus Paradise didn't even offer an affiliate program to the public until just a few months ago. Gee, I wonder why they went from being serious competition to one step away from complete obscurity.
The point is, the money in online poker is really starting to become serious. It's going to start attracting people who actually know what the hell they're doing and sooner or later somebody is going to come along and clean Party's clock in a big way. My prediction is that the Vegas casinos are going to lobby for legalization (maybe when Bush's term is up) and then throw a few hundred million at the problem. For guys who spend that kind of dough on water fountains, they should be able to put together a marketing campaign that makes the PokerStars and Party television ads look like Ronco Pocket Fisherman spots (which they already do but there's no real competition).
4. Party already screws its affiliates. They've recently started doing stuff like presenting a pop-up ad during signup that offers them some sort of bonus code that can be used in conjunction with the affiliate code but many people coming from affiliate links just use the Party bonus code and voila, Party doesn't have to pay the affiliate. A lot of the affiliates are stomping mad about it but Party is happy playing stupid and simply stating that the user can use both codes and the affiliate still gets paid.
Party's biggest problem is that they need to show growth. They're too stupid to actually grow the company legitimately so they're slowly screwing everyone around them in the hopes nobody will notice until it's too late. It's like that putting a frog in water and then slowly turning up the heat. By the time it gets too hot, it's too late.
How do you offer a rakeback without giving away the store? How about you do it based on hand played. Play 10,000 hands you get X%, 20,000 hands Y%, etc, etc. People saying they can't do it aren't thinking creatively enough. You keep your big dogs happy because they're already playing tens of thousands of hands a month and it gives an incentive to newer players to play more raked hands! Do you think that Party hasn't considered this? Of course they have but since they're only looking at this in the 1 - 3 year timeline and it's much more profitable for them to simply shut down affiliates who offer rakebacks stealing away players who signed up directly with Party and where Party was getting 100% of the rake.
The top 20% of Party's affiliates likely generate over 80% of the (affiliate related) new customers anyway (I've run affiliate programs for online retailers and this is pretty much the norm). Everybody else is simply giving them free advertising. As long as they keep that top 20% from sqwaking too much they're happy. That's another reason why they get all motivated to stop rakeback deals. That top 20% doesn't want to have to compete with people willing to share some of their profits with the players.
I anxiously await some real competition to come to this market. The only move Party will have left will be to compete which is in all our best interests.
|
Scuba Chuck
veteran
Reged: 11/22/04
Posts: 1537
Loc: 1-table tournaments
|
|
Quote:
I've read several threads at casinoaffiliates.com today and in every one, the affiliates come off as whiny children tattling on their siblings to Momma Satya. Not only is their handling of the situation childish and silly, but the affiliates posting on that site come off as wanting to mooch off their client players and give nothing in return.
As a player, I just don't see any reason to give these leaches any cut of my play if they aren't providing a tangible service. It's just as easy to go directly to partypoker.com and download the client without using an affiliate link as it is to click through one of their portal sites. Contrary to their beliefs, many people know they are clicking through an affiliate link and give thought to who is benefitting from the deal even if they don't consider rakeback.
While I don't have a pat answer for which approach is best for Party or the affiliates, I do happen to be a happy client of the "major affiliate" that they all want to see brought down. And quite frankly, I'm offended by the whole thing. This isn't because I'm greedy and want something for nothing (I am and I do, but thats not why I care) its because I'm very satisfied with the business relationship I've established with my affliate. Everyone gets exactly what they expect, Party gets all of my non bonus-chasing play, the affiliate receives some healthy income and I get gift cards which all go to my wife and keep her satisfied with the time I spend playing.
If the leaches posting at casinoaffiliates.com have their way, they would destroy that healthy, functioning relationship and still not get my business.
In other words, because they are not creative enough to compete with a leader, the seek to cut that leader down at the knees and hurt thousands of players in the process. That is simply childish.
Amen brother. I've got the same process.
|
CORed
enthusiast
Reged: 09/03/02
Posts: 273
|
|
Party's 15/30 has gotten quite a bit tighter in the last few months. I can still find a good game, but I have had to make some adustments to keep winning, and I am finding that I have to be more careful in game selection to maintain an advantage. I think that Party was willing to look the other way on rakeback during their growth phase, but I think the poster that suggested that they are trying to get rid of it now to help their IPO is on the money.
|