Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Defending with cheese. (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=321399)

Entity 08-23-2005 07:18 PM

Defending with cheese.
 
5/10 6max. Unknowns because you just sat at the table.

UTG folds. MP raises. CO folds. Button folds. SB folds.

You're in the BB with:

1) T8o
2) T9o
3) JTo
4) QJo
5) 76o
6) 98o
7) 86o
8) J9o
9) QTo
10) K9o

Which of these do we call?

Rob

waffle 08-23-2005 07:22 PM

Re: Defending with cheese.
 
1) T8o f
2) T9o call
3) JTo call
4) QJo call
5) 76o f
6) 98o f
7) 86o f
8) J9o call
9) QTo call
10) K9o call

maybe i'm too loose [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

baronzeus 08-23-2005 07:25 PM

Re: Defending with cheese.
 
fold 76o, fold 86o. call the rest.

MarkL444 08-23-2005 07:25 PM

Re: Defending with cheese.
 
1) T8o f
2) T9o c
3) JTo c
4) QJo c
5) 76o f
6) 98o c
7) 86o f
8) J9o ?
9) QTo f
10) K9o f

BreakEvenPlayer 08-23-2005 07:35 PM

Re: Defending with cheese.
 
I fold 8-10.

Alobar 08-23-2005 07:35 PM

Re: Defending with cheese.
 
im not really excited about calling with any of them given the circumstances

that doesnt necessarily(sp?) mean I'm folding them all tho

Lurker4 08-23-2005 07:40 PM

Re: Defending with cheese.
 
I fold all of these, maybe I'm too tight...my Fold BB to steal tends to hover around HUSH standards though. I guess BB defense against MP and UTG openraises are where I'm tighter than normal.

Kakafoni 08-23-2005 08:16 PM

Re: Defending with cheese.
 
My ideas

1) T8o Fold
2) T9o Call
3) JTo Call
4) QJo Call
5) 76o Fold
6) 98o Call
7) 86o Fold
8) J9o Call
9) QTo Call
10) K9o Fold

//Marcus

Redeye 08-23-2005 08:47 PM

Re: Defending with cheese.
 
Looking at the responses, I find it interesting that many will play hands like T9o and 98o but not T8o or 76o. What is the reasoning for this? Looking at equity alone, which I know doesn't provide the entire reason for calling, these hands are almost identical in equity vs. someone who'll raise about 13% of there hands. (A number which I think may be reasonable against an unkown in MP, maybe a little higher but that won't change things substantially).

Do we want to avoid hands like QJo to avoid domination? I noticed that equity wise, against someone who would raise about 13% of there hands from that spot, QJo is only marginally better in terms of equity than a hand like 76o, about 2-3% better. Similarly with the other non-broadway hands. Does the lack of potential domination make these more profitable to defend with since hand equities are so uniform? What about the reverse-implied odds associated with the weaker rank cards than the low broadways?

Interestingly, as soon as you increase the raise % to about 20+%, hands like QJo, QTo, and K9o really increase in equity to about 40% and up where as hands like T9o, 89o, etc remain almost unchanged. I guess that really shows how much you need to know your opponent to decide what to play in the BB here.

I guess an unknown from MP is a little early to make some of these decisions without any read at all. I think you're a lot better off assuming wide raising standards in the CO and especially the button. However, I think there is a lot more variability in raising standards from MP between different opponents. I still really haven't made up my mind what if anything is worth playing against an unknown in this spot.

Wynton 08-23-2005 08:55 PM

Re: Defending with cheese.
 
My answers might be different tomorrow. But for today, here they are:

1) T8o F
2) T9o F
3) JTo C
4) QJo C
5) 76o F
6) 98o F
7) 86o F
8) J9o F
9) QTo C
10) K9o C


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.