Comparsion check: 2+2
 

Compare 2+2 of two years ago (or one year ago) to 2+2 of today.

Pluses and minuses.

What has improved? What has deteriorated?

Any remedies or suggestions for improvements?

Other general comments/explanations welcome.

The following poll will last for seven days.

Edit: The poll lasts indefinitely, not just for seven days.

Re: Comparsion check: 2+2
 

I said "deteriorated" but it's down from fantastic to excellent.

The main reason for this is that many of my favorite posters from earlier times (Fossilman, Ed Miller, David Ross to name a few) aren't the regular presence that they once were.

I'm a big fan of many current posters, but it's hard not to miss some of the old regulars.

Re: Comparsion check: 2+2
 

I think there are the same amount of good threads. However, there are tons more threads to weed through to get to them. Threads back then were much easier to keep up on.

But then you're talking about 10-15 'main' posters back then compared to 100 now. I think i'll always think of those years as the 'golden' years of 2+2.

b

Re: Comparsion check: 2+2
 

OOT is vastly improved.

Re: Comparsion check: 2+2
 

[ QUOTE ]
OOT is vastly improved.

[/ QUOTE ]
Insofar as it didn't exist one year ago, I agree.

Re: Comparsion check: 2+2
 

OOT is awesome, some of the other forums suck though, and a lot of the poker strategy forums are infected with absurd bitching and arguments over semantics, yuck!

Re: Comparsion check: 2+2
 

Stayed relatively the same. CHECK

Re: Comparsion check: 2+2
 

Whats the OOT forum?

Oh, wait....do you mean the TSC forum?

Re: Comparsion check: 2+2
 

[ QUOTE ]
Whats the OOT forum?

Oh, wait....do you mean the TSC forum?

[/ QUOTE ]as far as I know the renaming was suppose to take place next week. Its still OOT, for now.

Re: Comparsion check: 2+2
 

Passing Diablo would be much cooler if it was strictly in OOT. Nonetheless, if you outposted Diablo with a poker hand in Small Stakes, that would totally rule.