The Supreme Court
 

Re: The Supreme Court
 

Rehnquist. And Bush will nominate Scalia for Chief Justice.

Re: The Supreme Court
 

This is really an interesting question as most thought GWB would appoint 2-3 judges in his first term. It seems unlikely that another 4 years would go buy without one or more appointments.

Re: The Supreme Court
 

[ QUOTE ]
This is really an interesting question as most thought GWB would appoint 2-3 judges in his first term. It seems unlikely that another 4 years would go buy without one or more appointments.

[/ QUOTE ]

Those Democrat Senators can no longer say that I am unelected, since I won an absolute majority of the vote (the first time in 16 years). With 55 GOP Senators, I hope my appointments will go a little easier.

Given the aggressiveness of his cancer, Rehnquist may not be alive in four years. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Re: The Supreme Court
 

I doubt it. I think he'll nominate someone just like Scalia for chief justice (too much baggage w/ Scalia)

Re: The Supreme Court
 

Do you guys think I need to nominate "stealth" candidates to get them confirmed?

Re: The Supreme Court
 

you should re-nominate Robert Bork. as a federal judge, EVERY ruling he ever made, then subsequently appealed to and heard by the Supreme Court, was upheld. the man simply is dead on with his decisions, and is the nation's foremost expert on constitutional law.

cheers!

Re: The Supreme Court
 

[ QUOTE ]
the nation's foremost expert on constitutional law

[/ QUOTE ]

spoken like someone who doesn't read much about constitutional law.

Re: The Supreme Court
 

I'm curious Elwood, what are your specific problems with Bork?

Also, for my edification, are you an attorney?

Re: The Supreme Court
 

[ QUOTE ]
what are your specific problems with Bork

[/ QUOTE ]

I am an attorney and I haven't said that I have any problems with Bork. I have a problem with someone claiming he is the nation's foremost expert on Constitutional law.