How\'s this for Variance (No Content)
 

I just bought a VERY nice new VAIO computer about two weeks ago, and I was going through SNG tracker last night and came across this.

These are the results through my first 150 SNG's on my Party screenname:


ITM~26%
ROI~A whopping -11% (Yes that's a negative)

Empire Screenname: once again 150

ITM~44%
ROI~47%

Can anyone in the world explain the two discrepancies...

I am finishing in 4th 38 percent of the time on my Party screename, but I couldn't tell you why. I try to think about the same things at each table I'm playing on M, Q, etc...

Finally, when I'm faced with a really tough decision I usually ask myself, what would JohnnyBeef do?

Sigma

Re: How\'s this for Variance (No Content)
 

"I am finishing in 4th 38 percent of the time on my Party screename" - If you are actually at this 4th place finish % it is no wonder you have -ROI%.

150 tournaments isn't very many though.

Re: How\'s this for Variance (No Content)
 

Well, my first 100 with my new monitor I got 5 4th places, than I managed to somehow have 22 in the next 100... obviously associated with the standard ROI drop. Back up since though.

Re: How\'s this for Variance (No Content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Finally, when I'm faced with a really tough decision I usually ask myself, what would JohnnyBeef do?

[/ QUOTE ]

I usually ask forumbot what to do. Most common answer? Push, Fold, Moeran.

Re: How\'s this for Variance (No Content)
 

8 tabling the $22s I went from $1k to $400 on my Empire account and from $1k to $2.5k on my Eurobet account simultaneously. Since then I have built my Empire account up to $3k and my Eurobet is only at $2.65k. This is over some 700 SnGs (350 on each).