Haupt_234
06-29-2004, 04:31 PM
MP1 is a LAG who pretty much bets everytime he is checked to.
Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (10 handed)
Preflop: Hero is BB with 4/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 4/images/graemlins/club.gif.
<font color="666666">3 folds</font>, MP1 calls, <font color="666666">1 fold</font>, MP3 calls, <font color="666666">3 folds</font>, Hero checks,
Flop: (3.33 SB) 7/images/graemlins/club.gif, 4/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, K/images/graemlins/club.gif <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="CC3333">MP1 bets</font>, MP3 calls, <font color="CC3333">Hero raises</font>, MP1 calls, MP3 calls.
Turn: (4.66 BB) T/images/graemlins/heart.gif <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="CC3333">MP1 bets</font>, MP3 calls, <font color="CC3333">Hero raises</font>, MP1 calls, MP3 calls.
River: (10.66 BB) Q/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
<font color="CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP1 calls, MP3 folds.
Final Pot: 12.66 BB
<font color="green">Main Pot: 12.66 BB, between Hero and MP1.</font> > <font color="white">Pot won by Hero (12.66 BB).</font>
Results in white below: <font color="white">
Hero shows 4s 4c (three of a kind, fours).
MP1 shows Js Qh (one pair, queens).
Outcome: Hero wins 12.66 BB. </font>
Now obviously it worked in this instance, but does anyone shun this type of play with the flush draw out and the risk of giving a vital free card? I was about 70% sure that MP1 would bet again due to his LAG tendencies and what I have seen from his play. I also put MP3 on the flush draw, where giving him a freecard would lose me atleast 1 BB.
Just curious on thoughts about this particular play. I have done it a few times lately, once with top set which lost to the runner runner flush (who was "cleverly" lured in by myself /images/graemlins/mad.gif).
Haupt_234
Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (10 handed)
Preflop: Hero is BB with 4/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 4/images/graemlins/club.gif.
<font color="666666">3 folds</font>, MP1 calls, <font color="666666">1 fold</font>, MP3 calls, <font color="666666">3 folds</font>, Hero checks,
Flop: (3.33 SB) 7/images/graemlins/club.gif, 4/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, K/images/graemlins/club.gif <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="CC3333">MP1 bets</font>, MP3 calls, <font color="CC3333">Hero raises</font>, MP1 calls, MP3 calls.
Turn: (4.66 BB) T/images/graemlins/heart.gif <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="CC3333">MP1 bets</font>, MP3 calls, <font color="CC3333">Hero raises</font>, MP1 calls, MP3 calls.
River: (10.66 BB) Q/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
<font color="CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP1 calls, MP3 folds.
Final Pot: 12.66 BB
<font color="green">Main Pot: 12.66 BB, between Hero and MP1.</font> > <font color="white">Pot won by Hero (12.66 BB).</font>
Results in white below: <font color="white">
Hero shows 4s 4c (three of a kind, fours).
MP1 shows Js Qh (one pair, queens).
Outcome: Hero wins 12.66 BB. </font>
Now obviously it worked in this instance, but does anyone shun this type of play with the flush draw out and the risk of giving a vital free card? I was about 70% sure that MP1 would bet again due to his LAG tendencies and what I have seen from his play. I also put MP3 on the flush draw, where giving him a freecard would lose me atleast 1 BB.
Just curious on thoughts about this particular play. I have done it a few times lately, once with top set which lost to the runner runner flush (who was "cleverly" lured in by myself /images/graemlins/mad.gif).
Haupt_234