09-09-2001, 12:03 AM
I frequent the 10-20 games at Foxwoods with a 1/2 kill. I also will play the 5-10 with a 10-20 kill. I play these games because I am comfortable with these limits, but I actually don't enjoy the kill. I have heard of arguments for and against it.
I'd like people's views on
a) Is it a good game?
b) Is it good for the game? (I think MM comments that this is a skew to the skill end of the luck/skill spectrum).
c) How do you optimize your starting strategy?
Here are some of my thoughts.
----------------------
Arguments against the kill:
---------------------------
a) you pay a 5-10 rake to play 10-20 ... same goes for 10-20. I say better just to play those games straight up.
b) it effects your hourly rate but giving up a part of every pot you win. For example, if you win a 5-10 kill pot, then you are giving up approximately $8.50 on every pot with a $10 kill blind, if you follow the 15% rule (Poker Essays 2). Perhaps it is more like $8-8.25 if you consider when you consider you have to post from SB/BB.
Arguments for it:
-----------------
a) Good players have an edge at higher limits. A lot of players are very timid when it comes to playing at higher limits, so it allows you to make profitable plays that you normally wouldn't make.
b) In some games, the 3rd blind encourages more action either by creating more money in the pot. I have also seen people call in order to maintain the kill/higher limit game.
How I play it:
--------------
Generally, I am more aggressive in the kill game. If I am on the kill blind, I will frequently raise with marginal hands (e.g. ATo early-mid pos). Like Skalansky write in HPFAP, since folding or raising is normally right, and you can't fold ... might as well raise.
I will also try to isolate a checked kill button as well. Both of these tactics are effective for stealing blinds as well.
I am also more liberal in calling with my blinds in an unraised pot.
The only area that I am more cautious is limping before the kill button, since I realize that there may be 1 or 2 raises after the button, assuming people play those the way that I do. So i generally will limp only very rarely.
------------------------------------
What do people think about this? Any feedback is appreciated. I am not clear that my kill strategy is correct. It is what I have developed and it has been profitable for me (1.7 BB/hr over 200 hrs)... however, I'd always like more!
I'd like people's views on
a) Is it a good game?
b) Is it good for the game? (I think MM comments that this is a skew to the skill end of the luck/skill spectrum).
c) How do you optimize your starting strategy?
Here are some of my thoughts.
----------------------
Arguments against the kill:
---------------------------
a) you pay a 5-10 rake to play 10-20 ... same goes for 10-20. I say better just to play those games straight up.
b) it effects your hourly rate but giving up a part of every pot you win. For example, if you win a 5-10 kill pot, then you are giving up approximately $8.50 on every pot with a $10 kill blind, if you follow the 15% rule (Poker Essays 2). Perhaps it is more like $8-8.25 if you consider when you consider you have to post from SB/BB.
Arguments for it:
-----------------
a) Good players have an edge at higher limits. A lot of players are very timid when it comes to playing at higher limits, so it allows you to make profitable plays that you normally wouldn't make.
b) In some games, the 3rd blind encourages more action either by creating more money in the pot. I have also seen people call in order to maintain the kill/higher limit game.
How I play it:
--------------
Generally, I am more aggressive in the kill game. If I am on the kill blind, I will frequently raise with marginal hands (e.g. ATo early-mid pos). Like Skalansky write in HPFAP, since folding or raising is normally right, and you can't fold ... might as well raise.
I will also try to isolate a checked kill button as well. Both of these tactics are effective for stealing blinds as well.
I am also more liberal in calling with my blinds in an unraised pot.
The only area that I am more cautious is limping before the kill button, since I realize that there may be 1 or 2 raises after the button, assuming people play those the way that I do. So i generally will limp only very rarely.
------------------------------------
What do people think about this? Any feedback is appreciated. I am not clear that my kill strategy is correct. It is what I have developed and it has been profitable for me (1.7 BB/hr over 200 hrs)... however, I'd always like more!