PDA

View Full Version : Pinnacle sportsbook has "to win" odds posted on WSOP


sublime
05-27-2004, 01:11 PM
Raymer is +1050

Clarkmeister
05-27-2004, 01:23 PM
Can someone post them all? I can't get to pinnacle right now. TIA.

razor
05-27-2004, 01:28 PM
12:00 PM

201 Greg Raymer +1050
202 Dan Harrington +880
203 Davin Anderson +1230
204 Marcel Luske +1150
205 John Murphy +1300
206 Robert Jarrett +1320
207 Josh Arieh +1235
208 David Williams +1500
209 Micheal McClain +1700
210 Chris Ferguson +1360
211 Eric Van Der Burg +1900
212 Scott Carpenter +1970
213 Glenn Hughes +2040
214 David Truong +2065
215 Gary Jones +2200
216 Harry Demetriou +2010
217 Jason Sagle +2400
218 Dewey Archer +2600
219 Richard Fullerton +3000
220 Mattias Andersson +3030
221 William Erickson +3040
222 Al Krux +3080
223 Eduard Scharf +3200
224 Martin Feijo +3900
225 Hung La +4040
226 Matt Dean +4400
227 James Grimes +4450
228 Kevin Bott +4545
229 Bradley Berman +4570
230 Julian Gardner +4600
231 Matt Lefkowitz +5100
232 Glenn Cooney +6700

sublime
05-27-2004, 01:31 PM
I have bet on the field to win at 1/1 odds(bodog), so that is a pretty good bet to come thru. I just threw 1/8 unit on Raymer to win. Anyone else have thoughts?

TheGrifter
05-27-2004, 01:33 PM
Other than the field, none of those bets seem good to me. I actually remember Greg posting about how none of the WSOP odds were good enough to lay down a bet before the tourney started...guess he was right.

Clarkmeister
05-27-2004, 01:38 PM
There is no field right now, that's just wagering on every single remaining player.

Given his chip position and the number of players who seem to be dead meat, I think the price on Raymer isn't too bad.

TheGrifter
05-27-2004, 01:41 PM
I'm a fan of Greg's as well, and I very much want him to win. But at this point he only controls 7% of the chips in play. That is a long, long way from 100%. Also, there are two former champions in good shape as well. The price on any one individual should be no less than 15-1.

PAUL-IN
05-27-2004, 02:26 PM
what does +1050 mean?

Uston
05-27-2004, 02:39 PM
Risk $100 to win $1,050.

MilesDavis
05-27-2004, 02:40 PM
[ QUOTE ]
what does +1050 mean?

[/ QUOTE ]

If you risk 100 you win $1050 (plus you get your $100 bet refunded).

adios
05-27-2004, 03:11 PM
I'd love to see Greg win it. He's been posting at this site since it first started up in the summer of 97. Go Greg.

With that said you make an interesting point here. Based on purely on chip counts odds are:

GREG RAYMER 1303.707803
DAN HARRINGTON 1551.367188
DAVIN ANDERSON 1666.364903
MARCEL LUSKE 1748.760933
JOHN MURPHY 1810.01506
ROBERT JARRETT 1836.259542
JOSH ARIEH 1881.640625
DAVID WILLIAMS 2128.910369
MICHAEL MCCLAIN 2433.966034
CHRIS FERGUSON 2553.242678
ERIC VAN DER BURG 2675.164114
SCOTT CARPENTER 2762.866817
GLENN HUGHES 2845.993031
DAVID TRUONG 2891.15566
GARY JONES 3062.718204
HARRY DEMETRIOU 3139.463602
JASON SAGLE 3462.5
DEWEY ARCHER 3766.615854
RICHARD FULLERTON 4413.345196
MATTIAS ANDERSSON 4445.698925
WILLIAM ERICKSON 4453.859964
AL KRUX 4495.108696
EDUARD SCHARF 4749.904398
MARTIN FEIJO 5924.940618
HUNG LA 6305.30303
MATT DEAN 7005.042017
JAMES GRIMES 7105.965909
KEVIN BOTT 7360.294118
BRADLEY BERMAN 7426.706231
JULIAN GARDNER 8243.75
MATT LEFKOWITZ 8646.551724
GLENN COONEY 13250


Compared to what's offered at the book

201 Greg Raymer +1050
202 Dan Harrington +880
203 Davin Anderson +1230
204 Marcel Luske +1150
205 John Murphy +1300
206 Robert Jarrett +1320
207 Josh Arieh +1235
208 David Williams +1500
209 Micheal McClain +1700
210 Chris Ferguson +1360
211 Eric Van Der Burg +1900
212 Scott Carpenter +1970
213 Glenn Hughes +2040
214 David Truong +2065
215 Gary Jones +2200
216 Harry Demetriou +2010
217 Jason Sagle +2400
218 Dewey Archer +2600
219 Richard Fullerton +3000
220 Mattias Andersson +3030
221 William Erickson +3040
222 Al Krux +3080
223 Eduard Scharf +3200
224 Martin Feijo +3900
225 Hung La +4040
226 Matt Dean +4400
227 James Grimes +4450
228 Kevin Bott +4545
229 Bradley Berman +4570
230 Julian Gardner +4600
231 Matt Lefkowitz +5100
232 Glenn Cooney +6700


So it looks like pinnacle has some idea as to the ability of individual players (perhaps it's a reflection of what the public thinks). Greg appears to be one of the best bets on the board but I concede the odds may not be right, don't know really. The worst bets seem to be to long shots who don't have very many chips.