citanul
05-24-2004, 11:16 AM
hi
i've recently been playing a handful of the party 10+1 sngs, and i was wondering,
i see most of the posts in this forum are about the nl sngs.
as a cash game limit player, i feel more comfortable at the limit tournaments. however, i've felt that since you can't do things like double up when you have a hand in limit, you can easilly lose a limit tournament just by having baddish luck with starting cards. i guess it's pretty obvious that the nl are more popular here, and that the starting cards are less likely to be your determiner because you acn be more patient and kill when you hit.
i guess that wasn't what i was wondering, what i was wondering is if anyone out there has any idea the difference in ITM% expected between the two, if there is one, any advice on general strategy (similar to the "beating the party 10+1" thread?) or if anyone has done something like that already?
are these limit tournaments not the game of choice because they are a less consistently beatable game, or because they are an entirely inconsistently beatable game?
i've been having mild success, but over a small sample size, i hope i don't sound like someone who has been losing and is whining now /images/graemlins/smile.gif
thanks,
citanul
i've recently been playing a handful of the party 10+1 sngs, and i was wondering,
i see most of the posts in this forum are about the nl sngs.
as a cash game limit player, i feel more comfortable at the limit tournaments. however, i've felt that since you can't do things like double up when you have a hand in limit, you can easilly lose a limit tournament just by having baddish luck with starting cards. i guess it's pretty obvious that the nl are more popular here, and that the starting cards are less likely to be your determiner because you acn be more patient and kill when you hit.
i guess that wasn't what i was wondering, what i was wondering is if anyone out there has any idea the difference in ITM% expected between the two, if there is one, any advice on general strategy (similar to the "beating the party 10+1" thread?) or if anyone has done something like that already?
are these limit tournaments not the game of choice because they are a less consistently beatable game, or because they are an entirely inconsistently beatable game?
i've been having mild success, but over a small sample size, i hope i don't sound like someone who has been losing and is whining now /images/graemlins/smile.gif
thanks,
citanul