Yardbird
05-12-2004, 10:03 PM
Being relatively new to No-Limit/Pot-Limit, I read Bob Ciaffone's rules for the format here (http://www.diamondcs.net/~thecoach/RobsPkrRulesHome.htm), and came across this notation (Section 14, Paragraph 14):
[ QUOTE ]
... Players are asked to refrain from instigating proposition wagers in any form. The players are allowed to agree to deal twice (or three times) when someone is all-in. “Dealing twice” means the pot is divided in two, with each portion being dealt for separately.
[/ QUOTE ]
I'm quite unfamiliar with the practice of Dealing Twice... What does it entail, exactly; and, why would this be done (or desirable)? /images/graemlins/confused.gif I assume this sort of thing is not permitted in the majority of public cardrooms?
Later on in the Glossary of the same document, is this slightly more detailed explanation:
[ QUOTE ]
DEAL TWICE: When there is no more betting, agreeing to have the rest of the cards to come determine only half the pot, removing those cards, and dealing again for the other half of the pot.
[/ QUOTE ]
Is the pot mentioned here a side-pot or the main pot? Who proposes this, who agrees, and why?
[ QUOTE ]
... Players are asked to refrain from instigating proposition wagers in any form. The players are allowed to agree to deal twice (or three times) when someone is all-in. “Dealing twice” means the pot is divided in two, with each portion being dealt for separately.
[/ QUOTE ]
I'm quite unfamiliar with the practice of Dealing Twice... What does it entail, exactly; and, why would this be done (or desirable)? /images/graemlins/confused.gif I assume this sort of thing is not permitted in the majority of public cardrooms?
Later on in the Glossary of the same document, is this slightly more detailed explanation:
[ QUOTE ]
DEAL TWICE: When there is no more betting, agreeing to have the rest of the cards to come determine only half the pot, removing those cards, and dealing again for the other half of the pot.
[/ QUOTE ]
Is the pot mentioned here a side-pot or the main pot? Who proposes this, who agrees, and why?