06-22-2002, 03:37 PM
I'm hoping for some feedback on some elements of Wilson's Turbo Texas Hold 'em software.
As I understand it, the optimal strategy used by the program when running simulations and playing against the computer is the same as that used by the "Automatic Advisor" *when set at the `almost always raise' option.* The rationale is that aggressive play has been show to be more profitable. This all makes good sense, but has anyone noticed some oddities with this strategy? To give a couple of examples, ATo UTG is advised as an open-raise and A7s in MP with two callers is also advised as a raise. To me, the former should be thrown away and the latter is a calling hand to get it multiway for the flush draw.
Part of my interest here is that many have used these kinds of programs to develop opening hand strategies, but obviously results are only as good as the strategy employed by the program.
TIA for any info, thoughts, etc.
As I understand it, the optimal strategy used by the program when running simulations and playing against the computer is the same as that used by the "Automatic Advisor" *when set at the `almost always raise' option.* The rationale is that aggressive play has been show to be more profitable. This all makes good sense, but has anyone noticed some oddities with this strategy? To give a couple of examples, ATo UTG is advised as an open-raise and A7s in MP with two callers is also advised as a raise. To me, the former should be thrown away and the latter is a calling hand to get it multiway for the flush draw.
Part of my interest here is that many have used these kinds of programs to develop opening hand strategies, but obviously results are only as good as the strategy employed by the program.
TIA for any info, thoughts, etc.