Tapped
04-22-2004, 04:41 AM
Have not played poker before, 1 week ago got myself Lee Jones's winning hold'em book to find out what it's all about, and I must say I'm getting addicted even in the short time.
The statistics was easy to understand since I used to play blackjack, and after 1 day of play money and 2 days of losing $100 at 0.50/1.00 ring games at party I found out NL $10+1 tables are much more fun, with a lot more newbs(like me).
Somehow NL feels a lot more natural to me, and I've done decently well. In 60 $11 games I'm at +$220, that's 45% top-3 and 33% ROI. Since this is 2.5 standard deviations above 0, I figure I'm doing something right.
According to other posts on this forum, 50% ROI is considered proficient. I was wondering though, how long did it take you to get to this level? A week, a month, 6 months? Was this all practice playing NL? Since limit seems so different in having to calculate pot odds.
What do you feel was the change that really boosted your play? Being able to characterize the players? My observation just isn't good enough to spot the stereotypes unless they do something stupid like going all-in on round 1 with A7o. Did this skill just take experience? Or more book reading?
Thanks a bunch for your help!
The statistics was easy to understand since I used to play blackjack, and after 1 day of play money and 2 days of losing $100 at 0.50/1.00 ring games at party I found out NL $10+1 tables are much more fun, with a lot more newbs(like me).
Somehow NL feels a lot more natural to me, and I've done decently well. In 60 $11 games I'm at +$220, that's 45% top-3 and 33% ROI. Since this is 2.5 standard deviations above 0, I figure I'm doing something right.
According to other posts on this forum, 50% ROI is considered proficient. I was wondering though, how long did it take you to get to this level? A week, a month, 6 months? Was this all practice playing NL? Since limit seems so different in having to calculate pot odds.
What do you feel was the change that really boosted your play? Being able to characterize the players? My observation just isn't good enough to spot the stereotypes unless they do something stupid like going all-in on round 1 with A7o. Did this skill just take experience? Or more book reading?
Thanks a bunch for your help!