05-03-2002, 04:07 PM
Yet another hand that's been bugging me. What's bothering me is probably due to 20/20 hindsight, but I'm wondering if I should have been more aggressive with this one....
6-12, L-P table. I'm on the button. 4 Limpers to me, I check my hole cards. KcQc. Oooh. Big suited connector! Multiway action! On the button! I love being in this position. Raise! SB folds and BB calls, along with the 4 limpers. 6 players, 11SB (After rake & jackpot drop).
Flop comes 6h-As-Js. Ick. All I have is a gutshot. And there's already an ace overcard. And a flush draw. BB checks, UTG bets, one fold, MP calls, CO folds. It's on me. Hmmm... 13-1 in the pot, but I've only got 3 clean outs to the Broadway, meaning about 15-1. And even if I hit, there's the flush re-draw. Marginal. I decide to take one off. Call. BB folds, and 3 of us see the turn, with 14SB = 7BB.
Turn was 8c. That didn't help. UTG bets, MP calls, I fold.
River is another brick (3h). UTG & MP both check. UTG shows 5s6s, and wins with his unimproved pair of sixes. (Never saw what MP had, though I suspect a draw of his own.)
Okay, here's the question. Should I have considered raising the flop? UTG was a new player, and I didn't have a good read on him. I was pretty sure BB was going to fold anyway, and with only 2 other players on the turn, a raise on the flop might have allowed me to do one of two things: 1) take a free card; or 2) bluff if not re-raised on the flop. If UTG re-raised a flop raise, I could have called to see the turn, then folded to a turn bet. I certainly would have had to lay it down if I raised, was called, and then bet into on the turn. (I'd have been getting around 10 - 1 on the turn if UTG & MP both called a flop raise, then UTG bet again and MP called the turn -- either way I would have to lay it down to a turn bet).
Given that I had raised pre-flop, I suspect a flop raise would have led them to believe I was playing a big pair or had just paired my ace. I also had position. Knowing what I know of their hands now, I doubt they could have called a river bet if I had played aggressively on the flop and turn, and the flush didn't get there. (I likewise would have laid it down if a spade hit). But would this have been over-aggressive? I have a tendency to play a bit weak-tight, and I'm trying to pump up the aggression level, though not to the point where I'm a L-A maniac.
Just when is it appropriate to pump it with a gutshot?
Comments?
6-12, L-P table. I'm on the button. 4 Limpers to me, I check my hole cards. KcQc. Oooh. Big suited connector! Multiway action! On the button! I love being in this position. Raise! SB folds and BB calls, along with the 4 limpers. 6 players, 11SB (After rake & jackpot drop).
Flop comes 6h-As-Js. Ick. All I have is a gutshot. And there's already an ace overcard. And a flush draw. BB checks, UTG bets, one fold, MP calls, CO folds. It's on me. Hmmm... 13-1 in the pot, but I've only got 3 clean outs to the Broadway, meaning about 15-1. And even if I hit, there's the flush re-draw. Marginal. I decide to take one off. Call. BB folds, and 3 of us see the turn, with 14SB = 7BB.
Turn was 8c. That didn't help. UTG bets, MP calls, I fold.
River is another brick (3h). UTG & MP both check. UTG shows 5s6s, and wins with his unimproved pair of sixes. (Never saw what MP had, though I suspect a draw of his own.)
Okay, here's the question. Should I have considered raising the flop? UTG was a new player, and I didn't have a good read on him. I was pretty sure BB was going to fold anyway, and with only 2 other players on the turn, a raise on the flop might have allowed me to do one of two things: 1) take a free card; or 2) bluff if not re-raised on the flop. If UTG re-raised a flop raise, I could have called to see the turn, then folded to a turn bet. I certainly would have had to lay it down if I raised, was called, and then bet into on the turn. (I'd have been getting around 10 - 1 on the turn if UTG & MP both called a flop raise, then UTG bet again and MP called the turn -- either way I would have to lay it down to a turn bet).
Given that I had raised pre-flop, I suspect a flop raise would have led them to believe I was playing a big pair or had just paired my ace. I also had position. Knowing what I know of their hands now, I doubt they could have called a river bet if I had played aggressively on the flop and turn, and the flush didn't get there. (I likewise would have laid it down if a spade hit). But would this have been over-aggressive? I have a tendency to play a bit weak-tight, and I'm trying to pump up the aggression level, though not to the point where I'm a L-A maniac.
Just when is it appropriate to pump it with a gutshot?
Comments?